![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a user who is using Outlook 2002 SP-2. He has over 1500 contacts in
his Contacts folder. I exported his contacts to a .pst file and imported the file to my computer for testing. Here's the problem: Most of the time when I type in a name in the search box it returns the appropriate results. But sometimes when I type in a name it doesn't find any of the contacts, even though they're listed right there in front of me! For example, I can search for "Mark" and it brings up the "Choose Contact" window and lists 15 different people with the name "Mark" (which is the desired result I want). However, if I search for "Mike" it brings up the "Check Names" window and lists all the Mikes in the Global Address List. It doesn't find any of the 40+ Mikes in the Contacs folder. I tried this on two different computers, one running Outlook 2002 and one running Outlook 2003 and I get the same problem. Any help with this would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You need to mention to which Search box you are referring and how you
configured the Check Names order for the Outlook Address Book. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Louie" wrote in message news ![]() I have a user who is using Outlook 2002 SP-2. He has over 1500 contacts in his Contacts folder. I exported his contacts to a .pst file and imported the file to my computer for testing. Here's the problem: Most of the time when I type in a name in the search box it returns the appropriate results. But sometimes when I type in a name it doesn't find any of the contacts, even though they're listed right there in front of me! For example, I can search for "Mark" and it brings up the "Choose Contact" window and lists 15 different people with the name "Mark" (which is the desired result I want). However, if I search for "Mike" it brings up the "Check Names" window and lists all the Mikes in the Global Address List. It doesn't find any of the 40+ Mikes in the Contacs folder. I tried this on two different computers, one running Outlook 2002 and one running Outlook 2003 and I get the same problem. Any help with this would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The search box located on the Standard toolbar, right next to the Address
Book icon. The Outlook Address Book is configured as follows: Show this address list first: Global Address List Keep personal addresses in: Contacts When sending mail, check names using these address lists in the following order: Global Address List Contacts "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: You need to mention to which Search box you are referring and how you configured the Check Names order for the Outlook Address Book. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Louie" wrote in message news ![]() I have a user who is using Outlook 2002 SP-2. He has over 1500 contacts in his Contacts folder. I exported his contacts to a .pst file and imported the file to my computer for testing. Here's the problem: Most of the time when I type in a name in the search box it returns the appropriate results. But sometimes when I type in a name it doesn't find any of the contacts, even though they're listed right there in front of me! For example, I can search for "Mark" and it brings up the "Choose Contact" window and lists 15 different people with the name "Mark" (which is the desired result I want). However, if I search for "Mike" it brings up the "Check Names" window and lists all the Mikes in the Global Address List. It doesn't find any of the 40+ Mikes in the Contacs folder. I tried this on two different computers, one running Outlook 2002 and one running Outlook 2003 and I get the same problem. Any help with this would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Then I don't understand the question. How is Outlook not doing what it's
configured to do? Once a match is found in the first folder, Outlook does not continue searching. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Louie" wrote in message ... The search box located on the Standard toolbar, right next to the Address Book icon. The Outlook Address Book is configured as follows: Show this address list first: Global Address List Keep personal addresses in: Contacts When sending mail, check names using these address lists in the following order: Global Address List Contacts "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: You need to mention to which Search box you are referring and how you configured the Check Names order for the Outlook Address Book. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Louie" wrote in message news ![]() I have a user who is using Outlook 2002 SP-2. He has over 1500 contacts in his Contacts folder. I exported his contacts to a .pst file and imported the file to my computer for testing. Here's the problem: Most of the time when I type in a name in the search box it returns the appropriate results. But sometimes when I type in a name it doesn't find any of the contacts, even though they're listed right there in front of me! For example, I can search for "Mark" and it brings up the "Choose Contact" window and lists 15 different people with the name "Mark" (which is the desired result I want). However, if I search for "Mike" it brings up the "Check Names" window and lists all the Mikes in the Global Address List. It doesn't find any of the 40+ Mikes in the Contacs folder. I tried this on two different computers, one running Outlook 2002 and one running Outlook 2003 and I get the same problem. Any help with this would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So to simplify my question:
My Contacts folder contains 15 people named "Mark" and 40 people named "Mike". Why, when I search for "Mike" in the "Type a contact to find" seach box, does it return results from the Global Address List when searching for "Mark" returns results from the Contacts folder? Shouldn't both searches return results from the Contacts folder? I can e-mail you screen shots if you'd like to see what I'm talking about. "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: Then I don't understand the question. How is Outlook not doing what it's configured to do? Once a match is found in the first folder, Outlook does not continue searching. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Louie" wrote in message ... The search box located on the Standard toolbar, right next to the Address Book icon. The Outlook Address Book is configured as follows: Show this address list first: Global Address List Keep personal addresses in: Contacts When sending mail, check names using these address lists in the following order: Global Address List Contacts "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: You need to mention to which Search box you are referring and how you configured the Check Names order for the Outlook Address Book. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Louie" wrote in message news ![]() in his Contacts folder. I exported his contacts to a .pst file and imported the file to my computer for testing. Here's the problem: Most of the time when I type in a name in the search box it returns the appropriate results. But sometimes when I type in a name it doesn't find any of the contacts, even though they're listed right there in front of me! For example, I can search for "Mark" and it brings up the "Choose Contact" window and lists 15 different people with the name "Mark" (which is the desired result I want). However, if I search for "Mike" it brings up the "Check Names" window and lists all the Mikes in the Global Address List. It doesn't find any of the 40+ Mikes in the Contacs folder. I tried this on two different computers, one running Outlook 2002 and one running Outlook 2003 and I get the same problem. Any help with this would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not the way you have it configured.
It will return matches from the GAL. Only if there are none would it return hits from your Contacts. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Louie" wrote in message ... So to simplify my question: My Contacts folder contains 15 people named "Mark" and 40 people named "Mike". Why, when I search for "Mike" in the "Type a contact to find" seach box, does it return results from the Global Address List when searching for "Mark" returns results from the Contacts folder? Shouldn't both searches return results from the Contacts folder? I can e-mail you screen shots if you'd like to see what I'm talking about. "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: Then I don't understand the question. How is Outlook not doing what it's configured to do? Once a match is found in the first folder, Outlook does not continue searching. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Louie" wrote in message ... The search box located on the Standard toolbar, right next to the Address Book icon. The Outlook Address Book is configured as follows: Show this address list first: Global Address List Keep personal addresses in: Contacts When sending mail, check names using these address lists in the following order: Global Address List Contacts "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: You need to mention to which Search box you are referring and how you configured the Check Names order for the Outlook Address Book. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Louie" wrote in message news ![]() contacts in his Contacts folder. I exported his contacts to a .pst file and imported the file to my computer for testing. Here's the problem: Most of the time when I type in a name in the search box it returns the appropriate results. But sometimes when I type in a name it doesn't find any of the contacts, even though they're listed right there in front of me! For example, I can search for "Mark" and it brings up the "Choose Contact" window and lists 15 different people with the name "Mark" (which is the desired result I want). However, if I search for "Mike" it brings up the "Check Names" window and lists all the Mikes in the Global Address List. It doesn't find any of the 40+ Mikes in the Contacs folder. I tried this on two different computers, one running Outlook 2002 and one running Outlook 2003 and I get the same problem. Any help with this would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So what would be the best way to configure it?
It doesn't make sense to me why searching for "Mark" returns results from my Contact folder but searching for "Mike" returns results from the GAL, even though there are 40 "Mikes" in the Contacts. "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: Not the way you have it configured. It will return matches from the GAL. Only if there are none would it return hits from your Contacts. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PMJI, but Russ already told you: Outlook stops searching once it finds a match. You have Outlook set up to search the GAL before it searches Contacts. Therefore, if it finds a match in the GAL, it does not look in any other address book.
If you want it to search Contacts first, then change the order under "When sending mail, check names using these address lists in the following order." -- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "Louie" wrote in message ... So what would be the best way to configure it? It doesn't make sense to me why searching for "Mark" returns results from my Contact folder but searching for "Mike" returns results from the GAL, even though there are 40 "Mikes" in the Contacts. "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: Not the way you have it configured. It will return matches from the GAL. Only if there are none would it return hits from your Contacts. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Depends on your needs.
What other information did you need to figure out the answer? If you hit no matches for Mark in the GAL, it will search and return results from Contacts. If you prefer to search Contacts first, then put it first in the search order. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Louie" wrote in message ... So what would be the best way to configure it? It doesn't make sense to me why searching for "Mark" returns results from my Contact folder but searching for "Mike" returns results from the GAL, even though there are 40 "Mikes" in the Contacts. "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: Not the way you have it configured. It will return matches from the GAL. Only if there are none would it return hits from your Contacts. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
First off, I really want to thank you both for taking the time out to help me.
So rephrasing my question: If BOTH the GAL and Contacts folder have a multiple "Marks" and "Mikes" listed, why does the search of "Mark" open the Contacts first and a search of "Mike" open the GAL first? I'd really like to e-mail you guys screen shots if that's ok to make it more clear what I'm seeing and what I'm asking. Thanks. "Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: PMJI, but Russ already told you: Outlook stops searching once it finds a match. You have Outlook set up to search the GAL before it searches Contacts. Therefore, if it finds a match in the GAL, it does not look in any other address book. If you want it to search Contacts first, then change the order under "When sending mail, check names using these address lists in the following order." -- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "Louie" wrote in message ... So what would be the best way to configure it? It doesn't make sense to me why searching for "Mark" returns results from my Contact folder but searching for "Mike" returns results from the GAL, even though there are 40 "Mikes" in the Contacts. "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: Not the way you have it configured. It will return matches from the GAL. Only if there are none would it return hits from your Contacts. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Error message "default mail client not properly installed" | Corn | Outlook - Installation | 7 | May 8th 06 08:06 AM |
outlook 2003 error "internet mail not registered properly" | paul | Outlook - Installation | 1 | April 19th 06 08:09 PM |
How do I change contact address default from "Business" to "Home"? | Kent | Outlook - Using Contacts | 1 | March 17th 06 07:13 PM |
"Find a Contact" | JordanShmoogie | Outlook - Using Contacts | 2 | February 28th 06 10:23 AM |
Why is "FAX" a valid e-mail type in address book? | Opus | Outlook - Using Contacts | 3 | January 13th 06 08:24 PM |