|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: 2003, outlook, problem, rules |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
February 19th 07, 12:13 PM
posted to microsoft.public.outlook
|
|||
|
|||
Outlook 2003 Rules Problem
I have created a rule which if an Email is received through a
specified account it should be perminently deleted. This is actually the third of three rules which is designed to deleted all spam, i.e. I am catching valid mail with the first two rules and anything that fails those tests should be perminently deleted. However when such an Email arrives, a warning box appears advising that I dod not have permission to carry out this action! The rule is then automatically disabled, until I enable it and the whole process starts again. With the rule disabled offending Emails reach my Indox. If I then run the run on my inbox the messages are then perminantly deleted without any issue. Can anyone explain this? Why do I not have the necessary perminssion when I am recieving the Emails, but once I have got them all is well and they can be perminently deleted. PWS 
|
| Ads |
|
#2
February 19th 07, 12:20 PM
posted to microsoft.public.outlook
|
|||
|
|||
|
Outlook 2003 Rules Problem
PWS wrote:
I have created a rule which if an Email is received through a specified account it should be perminently deleted. PLEASE stop all this posting - just look at the replies to your first post....
|
|
#3
February 19th 07, 12:39 PM
posted to microsoft.public.outlook
|
|||
|
|||
|
Outlook 2003 Rules Problem
On Feb 19, 1:20 pm, Gordon wrote:
PWS wrote: I have created a rule which if an Email is received through a specified account it should be perminently deleted. PLEASE stop all this posting - just look at the replies to your first post.... I sincerely apologise..... I did not see my original postings because I use a Subject which was already in use, hence why I did not see them.
|
|
#4
February 20th 07, 06:14 AM
posted to microsoft.public.outlook
|
|||
|
|||
|
Outlook 2003 Rules Problem
It always helps to use a more descriptive subject line :-)
-- Jocelyn Fiorello MVP - Outlook *** Messages sent to my e-mail address will NOT be answered -- please reply only to the newsgroup to preserve the message thread. *** "PWS" wrote: On Feb 19, 1:20 pm, Gordon wrote: PWS wrote: I have created a rule which if an Email is received through a specified account it should be perminently deleted. PLEASE stop all this posting - just look at the replies to your first post.... I sincerely apologise..... I did not see my original postings because I use a Subject which was already in use, hence why I did not see them.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Problem creating new outlook express 6 message rules | dotbowels | Outlook Express | 9 | February 4th 07 07:18 AM |
| Outlook 2002 problem with rules | mark@whitestardata.com | Outlook - General Queries | 3 | October 25th 06 01:19 PM |
| rules and alerts limits with outlook 2003 & Exchange 2003 | Jeje | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | June 9th 06 01:44 AM |
| Outlook 2003 Rules, Problem not enough | google@pichara.com | Add-ins for Outlook | 1 | February 22nd 06 10:02 PM |
| Outlook Express Mail Rules Problem | Bernie Kilshaw | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | February 15th 06 02:33 PM |
Linear Mode
