|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#3
June 17th 06, 10:11 PM
posted to microsoft.public.outlook
|
|||
|
|||
No Tree Structure in OL 2003 Folder List for Contacts
On Wed, 31 May 2006 10:04:52 -0700, "Diane Poremsky [MVP]"
wrote: you shouldn't have a boatload of folders and sub folders - and if there is, use folder list. I don't have Outlook 2000 installed anymore so I can't compare, but ever since I installed 2003 I have been frustrated by having a long NON-tree list of my contacts. I can see far more reason for a boatload of folders amongst contacts than among email. IMHO MS has made a design mistake here. Why allow you to setup a hierarchy of contacts & then not display them in a tree except if you display them along with all your other emails etc. etc. etc. I take it there is no solution, not even a registry tweak or freeware ad don. -- "J. J." 
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Calendar folder missing from folder list in outlook 2003 | Bill B | Outlook - Calandaring | 11 | July 7th 06 04:44 PM |
| Personal folder structure | Jack Dorson | Outlook - Installation | 1 | May 11th 06 07:26 PM |
| Public folder contacts list options | Tom | Outlook - Using Contacts | 1 | April 7th 06 09:00 PM |
| How should I set up folder structure in Outlook 2002? | Peter Barrett | Outlook - Installation | 3 | April 7th 06 12:27 PM |
| How to bequeath permission in deep user-folder-structure in mailbo | Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] | Outlook and VBA | 3 | February 3rd 06 11:46 AM |
Threaded Mode