exciter wrote:

Of course I believe the figures given "afterwards" but this was after
my saying that i dont believe.

So, do you believe your unbelief made the numbers change?

So dont make demogogy on things and dont change things to your
advanatage to insult someone even more.

If you ask your mechanic how best to repair your vehicle, do you say "I
don't believe you, prove it," or do you accept the advice of someone whom
you know to be an expert in a field you are not?
--
Brian Tillman

"Diane Poremsky [MVP]" wrote in
:

No need to guess - it's true.

Haven't seen the RTM yet, wouldn't surprise me if they delayed release
2 years and re-wrote the whole thing.... ;-)

"Brian Tillman" wrote in message
...
| exciter wrote:
|
| Of course I believe the figures given "afterwards" but this was after
| my saying that i dont believe.
|
| So, do you believe your unbelief made the numbers change?

It did not. However, this does not prevenet me question the numbers.


| If you ask your mechanic how best to repair your vehicle, do you say "I
| don't believe you, prove it,"
Yes I can very well may not believe the mechanic and what he says.
I will search in the market for references and bechmarks.
The nobel price has been assigned to the economic model which asserts the
importance of
"signaling" effects... If you are interested you may want to check the
argument behind it.

| or do you accept the advice of someone whom
| you know to be an expert in a field you are not?

It depends on how one doubts about things. Surely I believe what experts say
but I also listen more than one expert on the concerning issue.

And still all these does not provide a reason to be impolite.

You guys question my reasoning, fine, but maybe
u should also question Mister Russ's impoliteness, if you are so eager to
question me.
Be objective and not biased.

I agree. And I apologize. It was certainly not my intent to be "impolite." I
simply misjudged your reply. One of the things that happens not infrequently
around here is for people to set us up by asking questions to which they
know the answer full well but dislike that answer. They use it as an excuse
to jump down our throats when they get the answer they don't like. Your
reply was so angry and well rehearsed that I thought you had used the
question as a set up for your soapbox, especially when you questioned my
credibility.
I see now that that is not the case. My bad. Sorry. Your need to question my
credibility threw me off.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"exciter" wrote in message
...
The VAST majority of Outlook users are corporate entities, NOT home
users.
That's what he meant.

I understood this of course after it is "explained".
Anyway, I think I am still right and someone has been impolite.
Bye

Your reply is appreciated.
The tone of my email might sound angry,
you are right in that too sir.
I am sorry too if that was the case.
Good bye.

On Sun, 14 May 2006 16:44:00 +0200, "exciter"
wrote:

| There have never been any plans to add news reading to Outlook.

Why not?
I personalley hear and read many people who wonder why there exists outlook
express anyway

I was going to say there are 3rd party products better than Outlook
Express for Newsgroups.

I don't know that much about RSS or Outlook's support of that, so
maybe you have a point.

--

"J. J."