![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I have a VB.NET (2.0) application that integrates with Outlook 2003. I have windows XP SP2. The users had Windows 2000, and Office 2000. They upgraded (!) to Office 2003. But: - an action that takes 0,5 seconds on my pc, takes them 4-5 seconds - an action that takes 2,5 seconds on my pc, takes them 8-9 seconds So for a test we completely desinstalled Office 2003, and did a full re-install of 2003 on a system. Performance increased with +- 30%: times are now 2,5 seconds and 6 seconds. But still much more than my 0,5 and 2,5.... What's the reason of this performance-problem? The user do have as much RAM as I, do have a better processor! (I have a stupid Centrino, they a P4 with HT). Will installing Windows XP the solution? Does Office 2003 perform better on Windows XP than on Windows 2000? Any help our hints would be really appreciated! Thanks a lot in advance, Pieter |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help. I cannot upgrade Outlook.Keeps saying it cannot open folders | Dan | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | February 7th 06 01:38 AM |
integration with windows sharepoint services | Loane Sharp | Outlook - General Queries | 0 | January 12th 06 03:51 PM |