Thread: integration with Outlook 2003: slower on XP than W2K? after upgrade?
View Single Post
  #5  
Old February 9th 06, 03:46 PM posted to microsoft.public.dotnet.framework,microsoft.public.dotnet.general,microsoft.public.outlook,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Pieter
external usenet poster
  
Posts: 27
Default integration with Outlook 2003: slower on XP than W2K? after upgrade?
I don't even knwo what a 1Gb port is, hehe :-)

Well, I somehow guess it's because of the fact that the clients do have
W2000 and not XP. When you see that they do have a 40% performance increase
by simply re-installing Outlook 2003 from scratch instead of doing an
upgrade from Office 2000 to 2003...

But before I ask the administrator to re-install a pc, I'd like to have some
support for my theory

"Cor Ligthert [MVP]" wrote in message
...
Pieter,

Are you than sure that you are not one of those special persons that got
from your administrator a connection on a 1Gb port?

AndElse

My expirience is that the time to get the startup information from
Exchange server seems sometimes to be endless, while for persons who never
clean up there folders in the pubs (or have very long address lists) it is
even longer.

Cor
Ads