If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Killing sent emails before transmission completes
I am using Outlook Express under XP. I am on a 768kb DSL. Mail is scanned
by Symantec. I understand that mail, when sent, is marked as "sent" before it completes because Symantec has it. Due to erratic problems with transmission, when I send a large attachment it may take much, much time -- up to 10 times or more slower than normal. (When I look at Task Manager/Networking, I can see that xmit utilization is very, very slow.) The problem occurs very randomly, so when I see it going so slow, I want to kill the transmission and try again later. I have turned off Symnatec's email scanning as a test and that seems to make nearly no difference. The only thing I have been able to do is restart the computer which seems like a really dumb way to do this. Is there a way to kill a message after I send it but before it finishes? Thank you for your suggestions. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Killing sent emails before transmission completes
Turning off the email scanning in Symantec doesn't usually get the job done.
You need to uninstall the program, reboot, and do a custom install without the email scanning module. "Hickory" wrote in message ... :I am using Outlook Express under XP. I am on a 768kb DSL. Mail is scanned : by Symantec. I understand that mail, when sent, is marked as "sent" before : it completes because Symantec has it. : : Due to erratic problems with transmission, when I send a large attachment it : may take much, much time -- up to 10 times or more slower than normal. (When : I look at Task Manager/Networking, I can see that xmit utilization is very, : very slow.) The problem occurs very randomly, so when I see it going so : slow, I want to kill the transmission and try again later. : : I have turned off Symnatec's email scanning as a test and that seems to make : nearly no difference. The only thing I have been able to do is restart the : computer which seems like a really dumb way to do this. : : Is there a way to kill a message after I send it but before it finishes? : : Thank you for your suggestions. : |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Killing sent emails before transmission completes
Turning off the email scanning in Symantec doesn't usually get the job done. You need to uninstall the program, reboot, and do a custom install without the email scanning module. "Hickory" wrote in message ... :I am using Outlook Express under XP. I am on a 768kb DSL. Mail is scanned : by Symantec. I understand that mail, when sent, is marked as "sent" before : it completes because Symantec has it. : : Due to erratic problems with transmission, when I send a large attachment it : may take much, much time -- up to 10 times or more slower than normal. (When : I look at Task Manager/Networking, I can see that xmit utilization is very, : very slow.) The problem occurs very randomly, so when I see it going so : slow, I want to kill the transmission and try again later. : : I have turned off Symnatec's email scanning as a test and that seems to make : nearly no difference. The only thing I have been able to do is restart the : computer which seems like a really dumb way to do this. : : Is there a way to kill a message after I send it but before it finishes? : : Thank you for your suggestions. : |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Killing sent emails before transmission completes
Thanks Tom. But, I really don't think it is email scanning for several
reasons. I have totally disabled Norton including not having it in Startup, and the same problem occurs. Also, note that I said the proble is completely random -- I have a 1mb file that I use as a test for emailing to myself. If it was scanning, the problem should occur with some consistency. Furthermore, even Symantec will not slow down sending by a factor of 10 or more. That 1mb file is sometimes sent in just several seconds and at other times many minutes. According to Task Manager, the % utilization rate is EITHER about 0.03% OR about 0.45%. I appreciate the suggestion. But, I have been trying to resolve this for over a year including testing with the ISP tech support and with a local PC guru. My question is simply, is there a way to kill a Send transmission without having to restart the computer. "Tom Willett" wrote: Turning off the email scanning in Symantec doesn't usually get the job done. You need to uninstall the program, reboot, and do a custom install without the email scanning module. "Hickory" wrote in message ... :I am using Outlook Express under XP. I am on a 768kb DSL. Mail is scanned : by Symantec. I understand that mail, when sent, is marked as "sent" before : it completes because Symantec has it. : : Due to erratic problems with transmission, when I send a large attachment it : may take much, much time -- up to 10 times or more slower than normal. (When : I look at Task Manager/Networking, I can see that xmit utilization is very, : very slow.) The problem occurs very randomly, so when I see it going so : slow, I want to kill the transmission and try again later. : : I have turned off Symnatec's email scanning as a test and that seems to make : nearly no difference. The only thing I have been able to do is restart the : computer which seems like a really dumb way to do this. : : Is there a way to kill a message after I send it but before it finishes? : : Thank you for your suggestions. : . |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Killing sent emails before transmission completes
Thanks Tom. But, I really don't think it is email scanning for several
reasons. I have totally disabled Norton including not having it in Startup, and the same problem occurs. Also, note that I said the proble is completely random -- I have a 1mb file that I use as a test for emailing to myself. If it was scanning, the problem should occur with some consistency. Furthermore, even Symantec will not slow down sending by a factor of 10 or more. That 1mb file is sometimes sent in just several seconds and at other times many minutes. According to Task Manager, the % utilization rate is EITHER about 0.03% OR about 0.45%. I appreciate the suggestion. But, I have been trying to resolve this for over a year including testing with the ISP tech support and with a local PC guru. My question is simply, is there a way to kill a Send transmission without having to restart the computer. "Tom Willett" wrote: Turning off the email scanning in Symantec doesn't usually get the job done. You need to uninstall the program, reboot, and do a custom install without the email scanning module. "Hickory" wrote in message ... :I am using Outlook Express under XP. I am on a 768kb DSL. Mail is scanned : by Symantec. I understand that mail, when sent, is marked as "sent" before : it completes because Symantec has it. : : Due to erratic problems with transmission, when I send a large attachment it : may take much, much time -- up to 10 times or more slower than normal. (When : I look at Task Manager/Networking, I can see that xmit utilization is very, : very slow.) The problem occurs very randomly, so when I see it going so : slow, I want to kill the transmission and try again later. : : I have turned off Symnatec's email scanning as a test and that seems to make : nearly no difference. The only thing I have been able to do is restart the : computer which seems like a really dumb way to do this. : : Is there a way to kill a message after I send it but before it finishes? : : Thank you for your suggestions. : . |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Killing sent emails before transmission completes
I don't know of any way to stop the send other than the radical way you are
doing it, unless clicking Work Offline stops it. How large is the attachment? Add about 35% to that for encoding. IMHO, I would not only do what Tom suggested regarding e-mail scanning, but would remove Norton all together. It is a huge resource hog, (McAfee is close behind), and get a better "Free" AV program like Avast, or even Microsoft Security Essentials which I have been running on two machines for a couple of months now with no issue. I would /never/ have anything made by Symantec on a machine of mine. Download and run the Norton Removal Tool: http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT...05033108162039 Symantec uninstaller may not finish the job: http://windowssecrets.com/comp/080207#story1 Microsoft Security Essentials: http://www.microsoft.com/security_es...s/default.aspx -- Bruce Hagen MS-MVP [Mail] Imperial Beach, CA "Hickory" wrote in message ... Thanks Tom. But, I really don't think it is email scanning for several reasons. I have totally disabled Norton including not having it in Startup, and the same problem occurs. Also, note that I said the proble is completely random -- I have a 1mb file that I use as a test for emailing to myself. If it was scanning, the problem should occur with some consistency. Furthermore, even Symantec will not slow down sending by a factor of 10 or more. That 1mb file is sometimes sent in just several seconds and at other times many minutes. According to Task Manager, the % utilization rate is EITHER about 0.03% OR about 0.45%. I appreciate the suggestion. But, I have been trying to resolve this for over a year including testing with the ISP tech support and with a local PC guru. My question is simply, is there a way to kill a Send transmission without having to restart the computer. "Tom Willett" wrote: Turning off the email scanning in Symantec doesn't usually get the job done. You need to uninstall the program, reboot, and do a custom install without the email scanning module. "Hickory" wrote in message ... :I am using Outlook Express under XP. I am on a 768kb DSL. Mail is scanned : by Symantec. I understand that mail, when sent, is marked as "sent" before : it completes because Symantec has it. : : Due to erratic problems with transmission, when I send a large attachment it : may take much, much time -- up to 10 times or more slower than normal. (When : I look at Task Manager/Networking, I can see that xmit utilization is very, : very slow.) The problem occurs very randomly, so when I see it going so : slow, I want to kill the transmission and try again later. : : I have turned off Symnatec's email scanning as a test and that seems to make : nearly no difference. The only thing I have been able to do is restart the : computer which seems like a really dumb way to do this. : : Is there a way to kill a message after I send it but before it finishes? : : Thank you for your suggestions. : . |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Killing sent emails before transmission completes
I don't know of any way to stop the send other than the radical way you are
doing it, unless clicking Work Offline stops it. How large is the attachment? Add about 35% to that for encoding. IMHO, I would not only do what Tom suggested regarding e-mail scanning, but would remove Norton all together. It is a huge resource hog, (McAfee is close behind), and get a better "Free" AV program like Avast, or even Microsoft Security Essentials which I have been running on two machines for a couple of months now with no issue. I would /never/ have anything made by Symantec on a machine of mine. Download and run the Norton Removal Tool: http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT...05033108162039 Symantec uninstaller may not finish the job: http://windowssecrets.com/comp/080207#story1 Microsoft Security Essentials: http://www.microsoft.com/security_es...s/default.aspx -- Bruce Hagen MS-MVP [Mail] Imperial Beach, CA "Hickory" wrote in message ... Thanks Tom. But, I really don't think it is email scanning for several reasons. I have totally disabled Norton including not having it in Startup, and the same problem occurs. Also, note that I said the proble is completely random -- I have a 1mb file that I use as a test for emailing to myself. If it was scanning, the problem should occur with some consistency. Furthermore, even Symantec will not slow down sending by a factor of 10 or more. That 1mb file is sometimes sent in just several seconds and at other times many minutes. According to Task Manager, the % utilization rate is EITHER about 0.03% OR about 0.45%. I appreciate the suggestion. But, I have been trying to resolve this for over a year including testing with the ISP tech support and with a local PC guru. My question is simply, is there a way to kill a Send transmission without having to restart the computer. "Tom Willett" wrote: Turning off the email scanning in Symantec doesn't usually get the job done. You need to uninstall the program, reboot, and do a custom install without the email scanning module. "Hickory" wrote in message ... :I am using Outlook Express under XP. I am on a 768kb DSL. Mail is scanned : by Symantec. I understand that mail, when sent, is marked as "sent" before : it completes because Symantec has it. : : Due to erratic problems with transmission, when I send a large attachment it : may take much, much time -- up to 10 times or more slower than normal. (When : I look at Task Manager/Networking, I can see that xmit utilization is very, : very slow.) The problem occurs very randomly, so when I see it going so : slow, I want to kill the transmission and try again later. : : I have turned off Symnatec's email scanning as a test and that seems to make : nearly no difference. The only thing I have been able to do is restart the : computer which seems like a really dumb way to do this. : : Is there a way to kill a message after I send it but before it finishes? : : Thank you for your suggestions. : . |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Killing sent emails before transmission completes
Totally disabling Norton still won't do it. It's already done its "damage".
If you choose not to do what I recommended, then you'll simply be ignoring one important step in your trouble shooting. Good luck. "Hickory" wrote in message ... : Thanks Tom. But, I really don't think it is email scanning for several : reasons. I have totally disabled Norton including not having it in Startup, : and the same problem occurs. Also, note that I said the proble is completely : random -- I have a 1mb file that I use as a test for emailing to myself. If : it was scanning, the problem should occur with some consistency. : Furthermore, even Symantec will not slow down sending by a factor of 10 or : more. That 1mb file is sometimes sent in just several seconds and at other : times many minutes. According to Task Manager, the % utilization rate is : EITHER about 0.03% OR about 0.45%. : : I appreciate the suggestion. But, I have been trying to resolve this for : over a year including testing with the ISP tech support and with a local PC : guru. : : My question is simply, is there a way to kill a Send transmission without : having to restart the computer. : : "Tom Willett" wrote: : : Turning off the email scanning in Symantec doesn't usually get the job done. : You need to uninstall the program, reboot, and do a custom install without : the email scanning module. : : "Hickory" wrote in message : ... : :I am using Outlook Express under XP. I am on a 768kb DSL. Mail is scanned : : by Symantec. I understand that mail, when sent, is marked as "sent" : before : : it completes because Symantec has it. : : : : Due to erratic problems with transmission, when I send a large attachment : it : : may take much, much time -- up to 10 times or more slower than normal. : (When : : I look at Task Manager/Networking, I can see that xmit utilization is : very, : : very slow.) The problem occurs very randomly, so when I see it going so : : slow, I want to kill the transmission and try again later. : : : : I have turned off Symnatec's email scanning as a test and that seems to : make : : nearly no difference. The only thing I have been able to do is restart : the : : computer which seems like a really dumb way to do this. : : : : Is there a way to kill a message after I send it but before it finishes? : : : : Thank you for your suggestions. : : : : : . : |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Killing sent emails before transmission completes
Totally disabling Norton still won't do it. It's already done its "damage".
If you choose not to do what I recommended, then you'll simply be ignoring one important step in your trouble shooting. Good luck. "Hickory" wrote in message ... : Thanks Tom. But, I really don't think it is email scanning for several : reasons. I have totally disabled Norton including not having it in Startup, : and the same problem occurs. Also, note that I said the proble is completely : random -- I have a 1mb file that I use as a test for emailing to myself. If : it was scanning, the problem should occur with some consistency. : Furthermore, even Symantec will not slow down sending by a factor of 10 or : more. That 1mb file is sometimes sent in just several seconds and at other : times many minutes. According to Task Manager, the % utilization rate is : EITHER about 0.03% OR about 0.45%. : : I appreciate the suggestion. But, I have been trying to resolve this for : over a year including testing with the ISP tech support and with a local PC : guru. : : My question is simply, is there a way to kill a Send transmission without : having to restart the computer. : : "Tom Willett" wrote: : : Turning off the email scanning in Symantec doesn't usually get the job done. : You need to uninstall the program, reboot, and do a custom install without : the email scanning module. : : "Hickory" wrote in message : ... : :I am using Outlook Express under XP. I am on a 768kb DSL. Mail is scanned : : by Symantec. I understand that mail, when sent, is marked as "sent" : before : : it completes because Symantec has it. : : : : Due to erratic problems with transmission, when I send a large attachment : it : : may take much, much time -- up to 10 times or more slower than normal. : (When : : I look at Task Manager/Networking, I can see that xmit utilization is : very, : : very slow.) The problem occurs very randomly, so when I see it going so : : slow, I want to kill the transmission and try again later. : : : : I have turned off Symnatec's email scanning as a test and that seems to : make : : nearly no difference. The only thing I have been able to do is restart : the : : computer which seems like a really dumb way to do this. : : : : Is there a way to kill a message after I send it but before it finishes? : : : : Thank you for your suggestions. : : : : : . : |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Killing sent emails before transmission completes
Asked/Answered (in principle) in IE6 Browser on 10 Dec-09.
Hickory wrote: I am using Outlook Express under XP. I am on a 768kb DSL. Mail is scanned by Symantec. I understand that mail, when sent, is marked as "sent" before it completes because Symantec has it. Due to erratic problems with transmission, when I send a large attachment it may take much, much time -- up to 10 times or more slower than normal. (When I look at Task Manager/Networking, I can see that xmit utilization is very, very slow.) The problem occurs very randomly, so when I see it going so slow, I want to kill the transmission and try again later. I have turned off Symnatec's email scanning as a test and that seems to make nearly no difference. The only thing I have been able to do is restart the computer which seems like a really dumb way to do this. Is there a way to kill a message after I send it but before it finishes? Thank you for your suggestions. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transmission timeout or protocol error | George Brown | Outlook Express | 2 | November 27th 09 05:25 AM |
Distribution list - auto completes, but not in contact folder | kmkw | Outlook - Using Contacts | 1 | April 9th 09 06:37 PM |
Instant Search not working and Outlook indexing never completes | Scooter | Outlook - Using Contacts | 1 | March 19th 08 08:07 PM |
email dissappears after send and receive completes | [email protected] | Outlook - General Queries | 0 | June 22nd 06 05:37 PM |
PROBLEME DE TRANSMISSION | Bruce Hagen | Outlook Express | 3 | May 3rd 06 03:38 PM |