![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ildhund" wrote:
Most regulars in this group (with one notable exception) would recommend ditching both McAfee and Norton and installing Avast or AVG. ---------------------------------------------------- Many techies do indeed hate Norton, and sometimes McAfee as well, with a white-hot passion. Three Principal Reasons Why: 1. They can't get employment with Symantec -- or McAfee -- which engenders vitriolic hate. [Many also feel the same way about Microsoft -- and for the same reason -- they were rejected by the corporation.] 2. The lesser-known, freeware programs are simpler and easier to hack. 3. They never want to pay for anything if they can help it, even though that means accepting an inferior product. 'Nuff Said. -- DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor "Ildhund" wrote: Most regulars in this group (with one notable exception) would recommend ditching both McAfee and Norton and installing Avast or AVG. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In ,
D. Spencer Hines typed on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:23:16 -0000: Many techies do indeed hate Norton, and sometimes McAfee as well, with a white-hot passion. Three Principal Reasons Why: 1. They can't get employment with Symantec -- or McAfee -- which engenders vitriolic hate. [Many also feel the same way about Microsoft -- and for the same reason -- they were rejected by the corporation.] 2. The lesser-known, freeware programs are simpler and easier to hack. 3. They never want to pay for anything if they can help it, even though that means accepting an inferior product. 'Nuff Said. -- DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor That isn't true at all! In my case. As when I was younger... I *loved* Norton and McAfee. Although then they started to add a lot of bloat. Then came the problems, incompatibilities, instabilities, lockups, etc. And especially with Norton, really *can* screw up your system after an uninstall. Then I switched to PCcillin. Then they started to cause the same problems because they started to bloat as well. As they all started to cause more problems than they fixed. And if AVG isn't careful, they are very close to be added to the do not install list as well. Maybe you enjoy an unstable system, but I don't! -- Bill 2 Gateway MX6124 - Windows XP SP2 3 Asus EEE PC 701G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC 2 Asus EEE PC 702G8 ~ 1GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC Windows XP SP2 ~ Xandros Linux - Puppy - Ubuntu |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I didn't say ALL techies fit this profile....
I said MANY techies... Congratulations!... _PERHAPS_ you are the exception that proves the rule. -- DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor "BillW50" wrote in message ... In , D. Spencer Hines typed on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:23:16 -0000: Many techies do indeed hate Norton, and sometimes McAfee as well, with a white-hot passion. Three Principal Reasons Why: 1. They can't get employment with Symantec -- or McAfee -- which engenders vitriolic hate. [Many also feel the same way about Microsoft -- and for the same reason -- they were rejected by the corporation.] 2. The lesser-known, freeware programs are simpler and easier to hack. 3. They never want to pay for anything if they can help it, even though that means accepting an inferior product. 'Nuff Said. -- DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor That isn't true at all! In my case. As when I was younger... I *loved* Norton and McAfee. Although then they started to add a lot of bloat. Then came the problems, incompatibilities, instabilities, lockups, etc. And especially with Norton, really *can* screw up your system after an uninstall. Then I switched to PCcillin. Then they started to cause the same problems because they started to bloat as well. As they all started to cause more problems than they fixed. And if AVG isn't careful, they are very close to be added to the do not install list as well. Maybe you enjoy an unstable system, but I don't! -- Bill 2 Gateway MX6124 - Windows XP SP2 3 Asus EEE PC 701G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC 2 Asus EEE PC 702G8 ~ 1GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC Windows XP SP2 ~ Xandros Linux - Puppy - Ubuntu |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In ,
D. Spencer Hines typed on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:51:12 -0000: I didn't say ALL techies fit this profile.... I said MANY techies... Congratulations!... _PERHAPS_ you are the exception that proves the rule. -- DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor "BillW50" wrote in message ... In , D. Spencer Hines typed on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:23:16 -0000: Many techies do indeed hate Norton, and sometimes McAfee as well, with a white-hot passion. Three Principal Reasons Why: 1. They can't get employment with Symantec -- or McAfee -- which engenders vitriolic hate. [Many also feel the same way about Microsoft -- and for the same reason -- they were rejected by the corporation.] 2. The lesser-known, freeware programs are simpler and easier to hack. 3. They never want to pay for anything if they can help it, even though that means accepting an inferior product. 'Nuff Said. -- DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor That isn't true at all! In my case. As when I was younger... I *loved* Norton and McAfee. Although then they started to add a lot of bloat. Then came the problems, incompatibilities, instabilities, lockups, etc. And especially with Norton, really *can* screw up your system after an uninstall. Then I switched to PCcillin. Then they started to cause the same problems because they started to bloat as well. As they all started to cause more problems than they fixed. And if AVG isn't careful, they are very close to be added to the do not install list as well. Maybe you enjoy an unstable system, but I don't! I don't buy that for a second! As I believe Norton, McAfee, and a few others screw themselves by trying to be cute and it bites them in their behind. And this is why they are not liked by experienced users. -- Bill 2 Gateway MX6124 - Windows XP SP2 3 Asus EEE PC 701G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC 2 Asus EEE PC 702G8 ~ 1GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC Windows XP SP2 ~ Xandros Linux - Puppy - Ubuntu |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Balderdash!
I'm an experienced user of Norton AV, et al., products since the early 1980's... Never had any such problems with any of them. Currently Norton Internet Security 2009 [NIS 2009] -- the whole enchilada. It's an excellent product... I Repeat, For The Slow, The Unsure & The Halting: Many techies do indeed hate Norton, and sometimes McAfee as well, with a white-hot passion. Three Principal Reasons Why: 1. They can't get employment with Symantec -- or McAfee -- which engenders vitriolic hate. [Many also feel the same way about Microsoft -- and for the same reasons -- they were rejected by the corporation.] 2. The lesser-known, freeware programs are simpler and easier to hack, so the doors are still open to them. 3. They never want to pay for anything if they can help it, even though that means accepting an inferior product. 'Nuff Said. -- DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor "BillW50" wrote in message ... In , D. Spencer Hines typed on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:51:12 -0000: I didn't say ALL techies fit this profile.... I said MANY techies... Congratulations!... _PERHAPS_ you are the exception that proves the rule. -- DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor "BillW50" wrote in message ... In , D. Spencer Hines typed on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:23:16 -0000: Many techies do indeed hate Norton, and sometimes McAfee as well, with a white-hot passion. Three Principal Reasons Why: 1. They can't get employment with Symantec -- or McAfee -- which engenders vitriolic hate. [Many also feel the same way about Microsoft -- and for the same reason -- they were rejected by the corporation.] 2. The lesser-known, freeware programs are simpler and easier to hack. 3. They never want to pay for anything if they can help it, even though that means accepting an inferior product. 'Nuff Said. -- DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor That isn't true at all! In my case. As when I was younger... I *loved* Norton and McAfee. Although then they started to add a lot of bloat. Then came the problems, incompatibilities, instabilities, lockups, etc. And especially with Norton, really *can* screw up your system after an uninstall. Then I switched to PCcillin. Then they started to cause the same problems because they started to bloat as well. As they all started to cause more problems than they fixed. And if AVG isn't careful, they are very close to be added to the do not install list as well. Maybe you enjoy an unstable system, but I don't! I don't buy that for a second! As I believe Norton, McAfee, and a few others screw themselves by trying to be cute and it bites them in their behind. And this is why they are not liked by experienced users. -- Bill 2 Gateway MX6124 - Windows XP SP2 3 Asus EEE PC 701G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC 2 Asus EEE PC 702G8 ~ 1GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC Windows XP SP2 ~ Xandros Linux - Puppy - Ubuntu |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"BillW50" escribió en el mensaje de noticias
... In , D. Spencer Hines typed on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:51:12 -0000: I didn't say ALL techies fit this profile.... I said MANY techies... Congratulations!... _PERHAPS_ you are the exception that proves the rule. -- DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor "BillW50" wrote in message ... In , D. Spencer Hines typed on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:23:16 -0000: Many techies do indeed hate Norton, and sometimes McAfee as well, with a white-hot passion. Three Principal Reasons Why: 1. They can't get employment with Symantec -- or McAfee -- which engenders vitriolic hate. [Many also feel the same way about Microsoft -- and for the same reason -- they were rejected by the corporation.] 2. The lesser-known, freeware programs are simpler and easier to hack. 3. They never want to pay for anything if they can help it, even though that means accepting an inferior product. 'Nuff Said. -- DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor That isn't true at all! In my case. As when I was younger... I *loved* Norton and McAfee. Although then they started to add a lot of bloat. Then came the problems, incompatibilities, instabilities, lockups, etc. And especially with Norton, really *can* screw up your system after an uninstall. Then I switched to PCcillin. Then they started to cause the same problems because they started to bloat as well. As they all started to cause more problems than they fixed. And if AVG isn't careful, they are very close to be added to the do not install list as well. Maybe you enjoy an unstable system, but I don't! I don't buy that for a second! As I believe Norton, McAfee, and a few others screw themselves by trying to be cute and it bites them in their behind. And this is why they are not liked by experienced users. -- Bill 2 Gateway MX6124 - Windows XP SP2 3 Asus EEE PC 701G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC 2 Asus EEE PC 702G8 ~ 1GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC Windows XP SP2 ~ Xandros Linux - Puppy - Ubuntu You should try Windows Live OneCare... Earle |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You should try Windows Live OneCare...
Earle Yes... Go ahead... -- DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor "Earle Horton" wrote in message ... "BillW50" escribió en el mensaje de noticias ... In , D. Spencer Hines typed on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:51:12 -0000: I didn't say ALL techies fit this profile.... I said MANY techies... Congratulations!... _PERHAPS_ you are the exception that proves the rule. -- DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor "BillW50" wrote in message ... In , D. Spencer Hines typed on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:23:16 -0000: Many techies do indeed hate Norton, and sometimes McAfee as well, with a white-hot passion. Three Principal Reasons Why: 1. They can't get employment with Symantec -- or McAfee -- which engenders vitriolic hate. [Many also feel the same way about Microsoft -- and for the same reason -- they were rejected by the corporation.] 2. The lesser-known, freeware programs are simpler and easier to hack. 3. They never want to pay for anything if they can help it, even though that means accepting an inferior product. 'Nuff Said. -- DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor That isn't true at all! In my case. As when I was younger... I *loved* Norton and McAfee. Although then they started to add a lot of bloat. Then came the problems, incompatibilities, instabilities, lockups, etc. And especially with Norton, really *can* screw up your system after an uninstall. Then I switched to PCcillin. Then they started to cause the same problems because they started to bloat as well. As they all started to cause more problems than they fixed. And if AVG isn't careful, they are very close to be added to the do not install list as well. Maybe you enjoy an unstable system, but I don't! I don't buy that for a second! As I believe Norton, McAfee, and a few others screw themselves by trying to be cute and it bites them in their behind. And this is why they are not liked by experienced users. -- Bill 2 Gateway MX6124 - Windows XP SP2 3 Asus EEE PC 701G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC 2 Asus EEE PC 702G8 ~ 1GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC Windows XP SP2 ~ Xandros Linux - Puppy - Ubuntu You should try Windows Live OneCare... Earle |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"N. Miller" wrote in message
... On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:23:16 -0000, D. Spencer Hines wrote: "Ildhund" wrote: Most regulars in this group (with one notable exception) would recommend ditching both McAfee and Norton and installing Avast or AVG. Many techies do indeed hate Norton, and sometimes McAfee as well, with a white-hot passion. Three Principal Reasons Why: 1. They can't get employment with Symantec -- or McAfee -- which engenders vitriolic hate. [Many also feel the same way about Microsoft -- and for the same reason -- they were rejected by the corporation.] Nothing to do with employment. Both McAfee, and Norton, severely hosed my old HP Pavilion 6745C (Windows Me) because of design flaws in the software. Anyone dumb enough to purchase and run Windows Me deserves whatever grief he got. It was incompatible with all sorts of software -- and Microsoft was not sharing the code properly. 'Nuff Said. 2. The lesser-known, freeware programs are simpler and easier to hack. 3. They never want to pay for anything if they can help it, even though that means accepting an inferior product. -- DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In ,
D. Spencer Hines typed on Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:38:48 -0000: Balderdash! Nonsense! I'm an experienced user of Norton AV, et al., products since the early 1980's... My computer career started in 1974 and my first home computer was back in 1981. There was no virus checkers back in the early 80's. And Norton was only a bunch of DOS utilities. And the very first virus that I remember was from a software company called Berkeley Softworks back in around '87. It was actually a Trojan which deleted the boot sector of its GEOS products if it thought it was a pirated copy. Unfortunately a lot of legal users got tired of paying them for new boot disks (that cost 20 bucks each time) every few months that we cracked our legal copies. And while Berkeley Softworks may have put a dent in piracy, they also ticked off their legal users as well Never had any such problems with any of them. Because you think it is do to something else probably. Google is full of horror stories do to Norton and McAfee problems. Currently Norton Internet Security 2009 [NIS 2009] -- the whole enchilada. It's an excellent product... That would be a miracle! They are not smart enough to make a good product. They were once a great product. But now they generally screw up everything they touch. Need I list all of their failed products? My guess is all of the old programmers are gone and nothing but new and inexperienced programmers are there now. The experienced ones are probably working for AVG and Avast. I Repeat, For The Slow, The Unsure & The Halting: Many techies do indeed hate Norton, and sometimes McAfee as well, with a white-hot passion. Three Principal Reasons Why: 1. They can't get employment with Symantec -- or McAfee -- which engenders vitriolic hate. [Many also feel the same way about Microsoft -- and for the same reasons -- they were rejected by the corporation.] 2. The lesser-known, freeware programs are simpler and easier to hack, so the doors are still open to them. 3. They never want to pay for anything if they can help it, even though that means accepting an inferior product. 'Nuff Said. Look! Once Norton and McAfee has burned you for 10 years... they could do anything they want too. For some of us, we will never trust them ever! I am so sick of paying software developers for years to only be repeatedly stabbed in the back. If you like them that is fine! But those whom they have stabbed over and over again will *never* trust them. And if they want to burn bridges as they go, good for them. ![]() -- Bill 2 Gateway MX6124 - Windows XP SP2 3 Asus EEE PC 701G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC 2 Asus EEE PC 702G8 ~ 1GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC Windows XP SP2 ~ Xandros Linux - Puppy - Ubuntu |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmmmmmmm...
Looks as if I've turned over a rock and found a poor fellow who's suffering from a most severe case of... Norton [Symantec] Derangement Syndrome. NIS 2009 -- their best product to date. A good working partner with OL, OE and WLM. -- D. Spencer Hines Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum "BillW50" wrote in message ... In , D. Spencer Hines typed on Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:38:48 -0000: Balderdash! Nonsense! I'm an experienced user of Norton AV, et al., products since the early 1980's... My computer career started in 1974 and my first home computer was back in 1981. There was no virus checkers back in the early 80's. And Norton was only a bunch of DOS utilities. And the very first virus that I remember was from a software company called Berkeley Softworks back in around '87. It was actually a Trojan which deleted the boot sector of its GEOS products if it thought it was a pirated copy. Unfortunately a lot of legal users got tired of paying them for new boot disks (that cost 20 bucks each time) every few months that we cracked our legal copies. And while Berkeley Softworks may have put a dent in piracy, they also ticked off their legal users as well Never had any such problems with any of them. Because you think it is do to something else probably. Google is full of horror stories do to Norton and McAfee problems. Currently Norton Internet Security 2009 [NIS 2009] -- the whole enchilada. It's an excellent product... That would be a miracle! They are not smart enough to make a good product. They were once a great product. But now they generally screw up everything they touch. Need I list all of their failed products? My guess is all of the old programmers are gone and nothing but new and inexperienced programmers are there now. The experienced ones are probably working for AVG and Avast. I Repeat, For The Slow, The Unsure & The Halting: Many techies do indeed hate Norton, and sometimes McAfee as well, with a white-hot passion. Three Principal Reasons Why: 1. They can't get employment with Symantec -- or McAfee -- which engenders vitriolic hate. [Many also feel the same way about Microsoft -- and for the same reasons -- they were rejected by the corporation.] 2. The lesser-known, freeware programs are simpler and easier to hack, so the doors are still open to them. 3. They never want to pay for anything if they can help it, even though that means accepting an inferior product. 'Nuff Said. Look! Once Norton and McAfee has burned you for 10 years... they could do anything they want too. For some of us, we will never trust them ever! I am so sick of paying software developers for years to only be repeatedly stabbed in the back. If you like them that is fine! But those whom they have stabbed over and over again will *never* trust them. And if they want to burn bridges as they go, good for them. ![]() -- Bill 2 Gateway MX6124 - Windows XP SP2 3 Asus EEE PC 701G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC 2 Asus EEE PC 702G8 ~ 1GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC Windows XP SP2 ~ Xandros Linux - Puppy - Ubuntu |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OE 2007 and McAfee Problem? | CharlieH41 | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | October 30th 07 09:57 PM |
Outlook /w McAfee Spamkiller | [email protected] | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | January 28th 07 08:31 PM |
mcafee | yvonne scholl | Outlook Express | 1 | September 26th 06 12:27 AM |
Why Outlook looks for McAfee .dll after I uninstalled McAfee | DL | Outlook - Installation | 8 | January 16th 06 05:26 PM |
Why Outlook looks for McAfee .dll after I uninstalled McAfee | David Aronow | Outlook - Installation | 0 | January 9th 06 02:51 PM |