![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for replying Hollis.
I don't think that changing the form name would help in this case though? The problem is that Outlook does not look beyond the local cache. "Hollis D. Paul" wrote: In article , =?Utf-8?B?VmF1Z2hhbg==?= wrote: New/modified custom forms in the Organisational Forms Library are not picked up by the user. New forms are cached if she creates a new item based on the form, but if she tries to open an existing item she gets the error message Best practice is to include the version of the form in the publish form name--myform_ver0xx--and increase the version number every time a change is published. That way, the forms cache problem is avoided; but you do have to use a utility to change the older data items to the latest form. Hollis D. Paul [MVP - Outlook] Mukilteo, WA USA |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
=?Utf-8?B?VmF1Z2hhbg==?= wrote: I don't think that changing the form name would help in this case though? The problem is that Outlook does not look beyond the local cache. If it is a new form name, it has to look beyond the local cache. Hollis D. Paul [MVP - Outlook] Mukilteo, WA USA |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, that's how its supposed to work, I entirely agree. But my user's problem
is that Outlook is not functioning as expected. For existing items it only looks in the local cache, andthrows up an error if it can't find the form there. Also, it doesn't check if there is a newer version of the form in the Organizational Library, always using the local cached version of the form if there is one. This means that if form names are changed when the forms are updated my user won't be able to use the new form for either new or existing items? Any ideas?? Thanks Vaughan "Hollis D. Paul" wrote: In article , =?Utf-8?B?VmF1Z2hhbg==?= wrote: I don't think that changing the form name would help in this case though? The problem is that Outlook does not look beyond the local cache. If it is a new form name, it has to look beyond the local cache. Hollis D. Paul [MVP - Outlook] Mukilteo, WA USA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
=?Utf-8?B?VmF1Z2hhbg==?= wrote: Any ideas?? A repair install, or a re-install of Outlook? Or, don't use cache mode. What he chooses depends on which pain is the liverwurst. Hollis D. Paul [MVP - Outlook] Mukilteo, WA USA |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK. Thanks for the advice. The system is a desktop workstation. It is
normally only used when connected to the server (unless the server/network is down for any reason). I spoke to the user and she has agreed to try working without cache mode. I switched it off and the forms work fine now. If working without cache mode becomes a problem, I'll try the reinstall. Thanks for the help and advice Vaughan "Hollis D. Paul" wrote: In article , =?Utf-8?B?VmF1Z2hhbg==?= wrote: Any ideas?? A repair install, or a re-install of Outlook? Or, don't use cache mode. What he chooses depends on which pain is the liverwurst. Hollis D. Paul [MVP - Outlook] Mukilteo, WA USA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Outlk 2003 Cache & Forms | LeoBloom | Outlook - Installation | 2 | March 8th 06 03:24 PM |
Form Cache | Joel Allen | Outlook - Using Forms | 9 | February 15th 06 06:55 PM |
Outlook new forms | Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] | Outlook - Using Forms | 0 | February 6th 06 08:11 PM |
blank forms | roger | Outlook - Using Forms | 6 | February 1st 06 11:20 PM |
Forms | Mostro | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | January 26th 06 04:34 PM |