If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How to STOP Email Synchronization in Outlook 2003
I work in a large multi-national company that uses Microsoft Exchange Server
2003 SP2 as its email server. And, while we currently support several different email clients, my concern is with Outlook 2003, especially in Cached Exchange Mode. Our company has set a 30-day retention policy on messages on the serer. No problem, we download messages anyway. But, a number of our employees experienced catastrophic loss of important email due to the synchronization process between the server and the client machines. Coming from other businesses that don't use Exchange Server, this can be quite a shock when you suddenly realize all your email is gone! These people were used to simply downloading messages from their company's mail server, filing them away and forgetting about them. "Synchronization" meant you download messages from the server, and you sent messages to your recipients, PERIOD. What in the world was Microsoft thinking about when designing a “synchronization” process that automatically deletes messages from a user's Mailbox that the user didn't previously delete? I am one such victim, and had no clue that Exchange server would seek & destroy messages that I had downloaded to my desktop for safe keeping, and even filed away in user-created folders away from the Inbox. But, they actively support users setting up AutoArchive to retain messages.) I’ve been tasked with producing a comprehensive explanation and user documentation custom-tailored for our employees which addresses these topics. I’ve found most of what I need through Outlook Help, the Online Help site, and the Online “Microsoft Outlook 2003 Tutorial”. However, a few questions still remain, which I hope someone can authoritatively and definitively answer. (We're going to publish this internally, so it needs to be accurate.) Synchronization Questions: 1. Is “synchronization” a user option which can be turned off by the client? We'd like to setup Outlook to only download received messages and not purge them from the local machines? 2. If synchronization can be turned off, how is this done? 3. If its not possible, is there a work-around (other than using .pst files)? We’re aware of .pst files and Personal Folders. But, we'd like to keep it as simple as possible for our users and not require them to use AutoArchive if we can help it. 4. For messages which have already been purged from a local machine, are there any log files on the local machine which show the last activity date of a specific folder and when its messages were deleted, in case a restoration is needed? Thanks in advance for your time, and any help or insight you might offer in this regard, -Robert |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How to STOP Email Synchronization in Outlook 2003
I won't answer your questions directly as answering them will not make
sense. The issue is that you do not understand what an Exchange server is and does. An Exchange server is a server that can (amongst others) process and store mail for a corporation. This means that Exchange is responsible for sending messages, receiving messages and putting it in the correct mailbox. Outlook is only a client and by configuring an Exchange account you basically look in the Exchange database to see your email. Outlook can keep a cache of that mailbox so that you can work offline with it and also to reduce network traffic and other resources on the Exchange server when requesting the same email multiple times. To keep this cache up-to-date with both new and modified items Outlook needs to synchronize with Exchange. This is a 2-way sync so what you see on the client is always the same as on the server. So to come back to your original message I start with this remark of yours; Synchronization" meant you download messages from the server, and you sent messages to your recipients, PERIOD. What in the world was Microsoft thinking about when designing a “synchronization” process that automatically deletes messages from a user's Mailbox that the user didn't previously delete? You can see that you were wrong on this assumption. Other than keeping your mail in your home environment via POP3 where you are responsible for your mail and not your ISP, in a corporate environment the mail admin is responsible for the mail infrastructure. This calls for a centralized mail solution (Exchange) instead of a per client (home/POP3) solution. Our company has set a 30-day retention policy on messages on the serer. No problem, we download messages anyway. Here again; centralized solution. All items that is older than 30-days and still in your mailbox gets deleted. This doesn't require a user action. You were wrong to think that you downloaded them; you only looked at them being on the mail server via Outlook as an Exchange account is a direct connection to what's in the mail database or in other words; your mailbox. As long as they are in your mailbox they are on the server. Moving them out of your mailbox into a pst-file means that you've actually downloaded them to your local client. If there is a business need to keep messages longer than 30 days, you should ask why they have a retention time of 30-days in the first place. This question is one you can answer now; 4. For messages which have already been purged from a local machine, are there any log files on the local machine which show the last activity date of a specific folder and when its messages were deleted, in case a restoration is needed? No, as the items were never on the local machine to begin with (other than the cache). Again; the Exchange server is a centralized solution and thus backups have been made centralized as well. If anything important got deleted from an Exchange mailbox, you should ask your admin if they still have it in one of there backups. Mention when you last had that item so they can load the correct backup. -- Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook] Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.howto-outlook.com/ Outlook FAQ, HowTo, Downloads, Add-Ins and more http://www.msoutlook.info/ Real World Questions, Real World Answers ----- "Robert" wrote in message ... I work in a large multi-national company that uses Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 SP2 as its email server. And, while we currently support several different email clients, my concern is with Outlook 2003, especially in Cached Exchange Mode. Our company has set a 30-day retention policy on messages on the serer. No problem, we download messages anyway. But, a number of our employees experienced catastrophic loss of important email due to the synchronization process between the server and the client machines. Coming from other businesses that don't use Exchange Server, this can be quite a shock when you suddenly realize all your email is gone! These people were used to simply downloading messages from their company's mail server, filing them away and forgetting about them. "Synchronization" meant you download messages from the server, and you sent messages to your recipients, PERIOD. What in the world was Microsoft thinking about when designing a “synchronization” process that automatically deletes messages from a user's Mailbox that the user didn't previously delete? I am one such victim, and had no clue that Exchange server would seek & destroy messages that I had downloaded to my desktop for safe keeping, and even filed away in user-created folders away from the Inbox. But, they actively support users setting up AutoArchive to retain messages.) I’ve been tasked with producing a comprehensive explanation and user documentation custom-tailored for our employees which addresses these topics. I’ve found most of what I need through Outlook Help, the Online Help site, and the Online “Microsoft Outlook 2003 Tutorial”. However, a few questions still remain, which I hope someone can authoritatively and definitively answer. (We're going to publish this internally, so it needs to be accurate.) Synchronization Questions: 1. Is “synchronization” a user option which can be turned off by the client? We'd like to setup Outlook to only download received messages and not purge them from the local machines? 2. If synchronization can be turned off, how is this done? 3. If its not possible, is there a work-around (other than using .pst files)? We’re aware of .pst files and Personal Folders. But, we'd like to keep it as simple as possible for our users and not require them to use AutoArchive if we can help it. 4. For messages which have already been purged from a local machine, are there any log files on the local machine which show the last activity date of a specific folder and when its messages were deleted, in case a restoration is needed? Thanks in advance for your time, and any help or insight you might offer in this regard, -Robert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re[2]: How to STOP Email Synchronization in Outlook 2003
Hey Robert (cool name!), thanks for replying to my questions! If I read you
correctly, what you're saying is that (regardless of whether I "understand" Exchange Server or not), the Outlook client CANNOT turn-off the server's ability to purge previously-cached messages (with the only exception being those that are Deleted by the user). Being able to DOWNLOAD received messages and upload sent messages as the ONLY client/server interaction is apparently not possible with Exchange and Outlook. Please correct me if I'm wrong in this assumption. Also, let me respond to some of your answers in a different way so you understand where I'm coming from (see my responses, inline): Thanks again for your time, -Robert ------------------------------------------ "Roady [MVP]" wrote: I won't answer your questions directly as answering them will not make sense. The issue is that you do not understand what an Exchange server is and does. An Exchange server is a server that can (amongst others) process and store mail for a corporation. This means that Exchange is responsible for sending messages, receiving messages and putting it in the correct mailbox. Outlook is only a client and by configuring an Exchange account you basically look in the Exchange database to see your email. Outlook can keep a cache of that mailbox so that you can work offline with it and also to reduce network traffic and other resources on the Exchange server when requesting the same email multiple times. To keep this cache up-to-date with both new and modified items Outlook needs to synchronize with Exchange. This is a 2-way sync so what you see on the client is always the same as on the server. According to our email services director, Cached Exchange Mode is the peferred client setup for our company and does in fact download a copy of the messages on the server to the client's cache for offline use. However, whatever changes are made to the Mailbox on the client machine are subsequently made to the user's Mailbox (share) on the server the next time they sync. So to come back to your original message I start with this remark of yours; Synchronization" meant you download messages from the server, and you sent messages to your recipients, PERIOD. What in the world was Microsoft thinking about when designing a “synchronization” process that automatically deletes messages from a user's Mailbox that the user didn't previously delete? You can see that you were wrong on this assumption. Other than keeping your mail in your home environment via POP3 where you are responsible for your mail and not your ISP, in a corporate environment the mail admin is responsible for the mail infrastructure. This calls for a centralized mail solution (Exchange) instead of a per client (home/POP3) solution. In a previous large company at which I worked (which used Eudora Pro clients; I can't remember what the server was but it wasn't Exchange), messages COULD either be left on the server (which eventually resulted in a full Inbox, unless emptied), or downloaded to the client (which permanently removed them from the server)! All message viewing, composing, sending and storage was done in the active "Mailbox" file using downloaded messages (if that's how you configured your client). Incoming mail was immediately downloaded to the client from the server upon receipt, or on a schedule established by the user. There was no need to create separate ".pst" files to save messages; we had one mail file, not an "active" message file (.ost) and an archived message file (.pst). And, the choice of whether to view messages directly on the server or on the client was a user setup option, one which I frankly miss. Our company has set a 30-day retention policy on messages on the serer. No problem, we download messages anyway. Here again; centralized solution. All items that is older than 30-days and still in your mailbox gets deleted. This doesn't require a user action. You were wrong to think that you downloaded them; you only looked at them being on the mail server via Outlook as an Exchange account is a direct connection to what's in the mail database or in other words; your mailbox. As long as they are in your mailbox they are on the server. Moving them out of your mailbox into a pst-file means that you've actually downloaded them to your local client. (see responses, above) If there is a business need to keep messages longer than 30 days, you should ask why they have a retention time of 30-days in the first place. This HAS in fact been addressed with our management. And, being that this is a foreign-owned company, our U.S. division is the only one of our entire world wide corporation that's plagued by such a 30-day retention policy. Its a direct response to the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley statute. And, its their attempt at reducing their corporate exposure (and saving server space at the same time). However, they also recognize the need for employees to maintain longer email histories. Therefore, they don't prohibit us from creating .pst files. The problem is, not everyone is familiar with or comfortable with creating and maintaining the two types of .pst files. We're looking for an easier user-created solution for saving (archiving) email messages. This question is one you can answer now; 4. For messages which have already been purged from a local machine, are there any log files on the local machine which show the last activity date of a specific folder and when its messages were deleted, in case a restoration is needed? No, as the items were never on the local machine to begin with (other than the cache). Well then, is there a log file that shows when the cache was last updated? Again; the Exchange server is a centralized solution and thus backups have been made centralized as well. If anything important got deleted from an Exchange mailbox, you should ask your admin if they still have it in one of there backups. That would be great, but our company has a "no restore" policy as part of its retention policy (already checked). Mention when you last had that item so they can load the correct backup. Again, that assumes you know when the message "disappeared", which you're not likely to notice until you go to retrieve the message and find its gone. Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook] Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.howto-outlook.com/ Outlook FAQ, HowTo, Downloads, Add-Ins and more http://www.msoutlook.info/ Real World Questions, Real World Answers ----- "Robert" wrote in message ... I work in a large multi-national company that uses Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 SP2 as its email server. And, while we currently support several different email clients, my concern is with Outlook 2003, especially in Cached Exchange Mode. Our company has set a 30-day retention policy on messages on the serer. No problem, we download messages anyway. But, a number of our employees experienced catastrophic loss of important email due to the synchronization process between the server and the client machines. Coming from other businesses that don't use Exchange Server, this can be quite a shock when you suddenly realize all your email is gone! These people were used to simply downloading messages from their company's mail server, filing them away and forgetting about them. "Synchronization" meant you download messages from the server, and you sent messages to your recipients, PERIOD. What in the world was Microsoft thinking about when designing a “synchronization” process that automatically deletes messages from a user's Mailbox that the user didn't previously delete? I am one such victim, and had no clue that Exchange server would seek & destroy messages that I had downloaded to my desktop for safe keeping, and even filed away in user-created folders away from the Inbox. But, they actively support users setting up AutoArchive to retain messages.) I’ve been tasked with producing a comprehensive explanation and user documentation custom-tailored for our employees which addresses these topics. I’ve found most of what I need through Outlook Help, the Online Help site, and the Online “Microsoft Outlook 2003 Tutorial”. However, a few questions still remain, which I hope someone can authoritatively and definitively answer. (We're going to publish this internally, so it needs to be accurate.) Synchronization Questions: 1. Is “synchronization” a user option which can be turned off by the client? We'd like to setup Outlook to only download received messages and not purge them from the local machines? 2. If synchronization can be turned off, how is this done? 3. If its not possible, is there a work-around (other than using .pst files)? We’re aware of .pst files and Personal Folders. But, we'd like to keep it as simple as possible for our users and not require them to use AutoArchive if we can help it. 4. For messages which have already been purged from a local machine, are there any log files on the local machine which show the last activity date of a specific folder and when its messages were deleted, in case a restoration is needed? Thanks in advance for your time, and any help or insight you might offer in this regard, -Robert |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to stop Synchronization | Phil at MNS | Outlook - General Queries | 17 | January 29th 08 04:00 PM |
Outlook 2003 Junk Email Filter won't stop filtering | [email protected] | Outlook - General Queries | 7 | October 18th 07 09:23 PM |
Outlook 2003 on Windows XP (home) "folder synchronization" problem | Hfreeman | Outlook - Installation | 1 | June 30th 07 03:05 AM |
Stop Outlook Express from Going to Next Email | Tod | Outlook Express | 2 | October 14th 06 03:48 AM |
Pocket PC Synchronization Outlook 2002/Outlook 2003 | Val Rollins | Outlook - Using Contacts | 2 | May 30th 06 06:24 PM |