|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
September 10th 06, 09:05 PM
posted to microsoft.public.outlook.installation
|
|||
|
|||
Where to put .pst for best performance
I have two SATA drives on my XP Home PC. Would it be better for Outlook
general performance to put the .pst file on the second disk, or to leave it on the boot disk along with the system and the Outlook application? Or no difference, trying to measure the speed of light with a stopwatch? Thanks, Dave 
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Email Server performance | Martin | Outlook and VBA | 1 | August 24th 06 07:24 AM |
| large VBAProject.otm; performance considerations? | Bob | Outlook and VBA | 2 | May 26th 06 10:08 PM |
| how to improve performance of Outlook | Raj Menon | Outlook - Installation | 3 | February 27th 06 03:25 PM |
| Outlook 2003 performance and activity log | Sergio | Outlook - General Queries | 0 | January 30th 06 08:52 AM |
| How to monitor Outlook 2003 performance/health | Sergio | Outlook - General Queries | 0 | January 27th 06 09:21 PM |
Threaded Mode