![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a user who's been migrated to a new machine. Her old one was a Dell GX270 with about 256MB RAM and XP SP2 and Outlook 2003. The new HP has the same software, but has 2GB RAM and is a new dual-core job.
The user has 563 PSTs. I wish I were exagerrating. She literally has some of these with 1 email in them. She has all of them "opened" in outlook (By that I mean she has them loaded, but not all are expanded). And... surprise, surprise, she's getting a lot of corruption in the PSTs, giving her problems opening emails and personal folders constantly. Here's the kicker: The original machine runs them just fine. It's old and slow, but it chugs along and doesn't seem plagued with this issue. She has all of the files open in the same manner, and works. Intensely frustrating, let me tell you. She refuses to believe that having 563 PSTs open is a bad thing because they work on the old machine. So, has anyone ever seen anything of this caliber? Any suggestions? The obvious one of "Close them" isn't an option at this time, and merging them down isn't either. This user claims not to have time, and keeps referring back to the old machine where her setup has worked for 3 years. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robbzilla wrote:
I have a user who's been migrated to a new machine. Her old one was a Dell GX270 with about 256MB RAM and XP SP2 and Outlook 2003. The new HP has the same software, but has 2GB RAM and is a new dual-core job. The user has 563 PSTs. I wish I were exagerrating. She literally has some of these with 1 email in them. She has all of them "opened" in outlook (By that I mean she has them loaded, but not all are expanded). And... surprise, surprise, she's getting a lot of corruption in the PSTs, giving her problems opening emails and personal folders constantly. Here's the kicker: The original machine runs them just fine. It's old and slow, but it chugs along and doesn't seem plagued with this issue. She has all of the files open in the same manner, and works. Intensely frustrating, let me tell you. She refuses to believe that having 563 PSTs open is a bad thing because they work on the old machine. So, has anyone ever seen anything of this caliber? Any suggestions? The obvious one of "Close them" isn't an option at this time, and merging them down isn't either. This user claims not to have time, and keeps referring back to the old machine where her setup has worked for 3 years. How, exactly, did you open the .PST files on the new computer? Alias |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Assuming the data was migrated correctly then it should function as before.
Is there any Antivirus software intergrated with Outllook, or any other new addins Not withstanding this a pst, a not a replacement for user created folders and as such the user should be instructed, after all how much time can it take to work though 6 at a time. As it is a receipe for data loss, and then the user will have considerable downtime, whilst the data is being rebuilt "Robbzilla" wrote in message ... I have a user who's been migrated to a new machine. Her old one was a Dell GX270 with about 256MB RAM and XP SP2 and Outlook 2003. The new HP has the same software, but has 2GB RAM and is a new dual-core job. The user has 563 PSTs. I wish I were exagerrating. She literally has some of these with 1 email in them. She has all of them "opened" in outlook (By that I mean she has them loaded, but not all are expanded). And... surprise, surprise, she's getting a lot of corruption in the PSTs, giving her problems opening emails and personal folders constantly. Here's the kicker: The original machine runs them just fine. It's old and slow, but it chugs along and doesn't seem plagued with this issue. She has all of the files open in the same manner, and works. Intensely frustrating, let me tell you. She refuses to believe that having 563 PSTs open is a bad thing because they work on the old machine. So, has anyone ever seen anything of this caliber? Any suggestions? The obvious one of "Close them" isn't an option at this time, and merging them down isn't either. This user claims not to have time, and keeps referring back to the old machine where her setup has worked for 3 years. -- Robbzilla |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What version of outlook is on the new machine? If 2003, do you have all the
latest patches and updates installed? I believe there was a hotfix for profiles with more than 50 pst's in them (but I can't find the KB at the moment). You really need to get her to reduce the number of psts - its not a very productive way to work. If you have an exchange server she should not be using any psts. -- Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook] Need Help with Common Tasks? http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/ Outlook 2007: http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2007/ Outlook Tips by email: Exchange Messaging Outlook newsletter: Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/ Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com You can access this newsgroup by visiting http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...s/default.mspx or point your newsreader to msnews.microsoft.com. "Robbzilla" wrote in message ... I have a user who's been migrated to a new machine. Her old one was a Dell GX270 with about 256MB RAM and XP SP2 and Outlook 2003. The new HP has the same software, but has 2GB RAM and is a new dual-core job. The user has 563 PSTs. I wish I were exagerrating. She literally has some of these with 1 email in them. She has all of them "opened" in outlook (By that I mean she has them loaded, but not all are expanded). And... surprise, surprise, she's getting a lot of corruption in the PSTs, giving her problems opening emails and personal folders constantly. Here's the kicker: The original machine runs them just fine. It's old and slow, but it chugs along and doesn't seem plagued with this issue. She has all of the files open in the same manner, and works. Intensely frustrating, let me tell you. She refuses to believe that having 563 PSTs open is a bad thing because they work on the old machine. So, has anyone ever seen anything of this caliber? Any suggestions? The obvious one of "Close them" isn't an option at this time, and merging them down isn't either. This user claims not to have time, and keeps referring back to the old machine where her setup has worked for 3 years. -- Robbzilla |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robbzilla wrote:
I have a user who's been migrated to a new machine. Her old one was a Dell GX270 with about 256MB RAM and XP SP2 and Outlook 2003. The new HP has the same software, but has 2GB RAM and is a new dual-core job. The user has 563 PSTs. I wish I were exagerrating. She literally has some of these with 1 email in them. She has all of them "opened" in outlook (By that I mean she has them loaded, but not all are expanded). And... surprise, surprise, she's getting a lot of corruption in the PSTs, giving her problems opening emails and personal folders constantly. Here's the kicker: The original machine runs them just fine. It's old and slow, but it chugs along and doesn't seem plagued with this issue. She has all of the files open in the same manner, and works. Intensely frustrating, let me tell you. She refuses to believe that having 563 PSTs open is a bad thing because they work on the old machine. So, has anyone ever seen anything of this caliber? Any suggestions? The obvious one of "Close them" isn't an option at this time, and merging them down isn't either. This user claims not to have time, and keeps referring back to the old machine where her setup has worked for 3 years. Honestly, that's beyond insane. Is this a paying customer? If they doesn't have Exchange, get them a hosted Exchange service. I wouldn't touch this mess with a ten-foot pole, let alone support it. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message "Lanwench [MVP -
Exchange]" hoo.com was claimed to have wrote: Robbzilla wrote: I have a user who's been migrated to a new machine. Her old one was a Dell GX270 with about 256MB RAM and XP SP2 and Outlook 2003. The new HP has the same software, but has 2GB RAM and is a new dual-core job. The user has 563 PSTs. I wish I were exagerrating. She literally has some of these with 1 email in them. She has all of them "opened" in outlook (By that I mean she has them loaded, but not all are expanded). And... surprise, surprise, she's getting a lot of corruption in the PSTs, giving her problems opening emails and personal folders constantly. Here's the kicker: The original machine runs them just fine. It's old and slow, but it chugs along and doesn't seem plagued with this issue. She has all of the files open in the same manner, and works. Intensely frustrating, let me tell you. She refuses to believe that having 563 PSTs open is a bad thing because they work on the old machine. So, has anyone ever seen anything of this caliber? Any suggestions? The obvious one of "Close them" isn't an option at this time, and merging them down isn't either. This user claims not to have time, and keeps referring back to the old machine where her setup has worked for 3 years. Honestly, that's beyond insane. Is this a paying customer? If they doesn't have Exchange, get them a hosted Exchange service. I wouldn't touch this mess with a ten-foot pole, let alone support it. While it certainly sounds like a mess, how would moving to Exchange help? Most of the "I lost my PST" horror stories I've had the pleasure to consult at have Exchange servers and most of those are configured such that it all but forces users to still use PSTs. Using 563 PSTs is just poor management, sure, but switching the primary store to Exchange won't help that. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BTW - there are stored on the local machine, not on the network or in a
roaming profile? If they are networked, it can cause corruption. Are you using an image so the computers are 100% identical, down to the patches? -- Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook] Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/ Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com Outlook Tips by email: EMO - a weekly newsletter about Outlook and Exchange: You can access this newsgroup by visiting http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...s/default.mspx or point your newsreader to msnews.microsoft.com. "Robbzilla" wrote in message ... I have a user who's been migrated to a new machine. Her old one was a Dell GX270 with about 256MB RAM and XP SP2 and Outlook 2003. The new HP has the same software, but has 2GB RAM and is a new dual-core job. The user has 563 PSTs. I wish I were exagerrating. She literally has some of these with 1 email in them. She has all of them "opened" in outlook (By that I mean she has them loaded, but not all are expanded). And... surprise, surprise, she's getting a lot of corruption in the PSTs, giving her problems opening emails and personal folders constantly. Here's the kicker: The original machine runs them just fine. It's old and slow, but it chugs along and doesn't seem plagued with this issue. She has all of the files open in the same manner, and works. Intensely frustrating, let me tell you. She refuses to believe that having 563 PSTs open is a bad thing because they work on the old machine. So, has anyone ever seen anything of this caliber? Any suggestions? The obvious one of "Close them" isn't an option at this time, and merging them down isn't either. This user claims not to have time, and keeps referring back to the old machine where her setup has worked for 3 years. -- Robbzilla |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/907651 - it was added to SP3 so you should
have it installed if everything is truly identical except for the hardware. -- Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook] Need Help with Common Tasks? http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/ Outlook 2007: http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2007/ Outlook Tips by email: Exchange Messaging Outlook newsletter: Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/ Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com You can access this newsgroup by visiting http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...s/default.mspx or point your newsreader to msnews.microsoft.com. "Diane Poremsky [MVP]" wrote in message ... What version of outlook is on the new machine? If 2003, do you have all the latest patches and updates installed? I believe there was a hotfix for profiles with more than 50 pst's in them (but I can't find the KB at the moment). You really need to get her to reduce the number of psts - its not a very productive way to work. If you have an exchange server she should not be using any psts. -- Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook] Need Help with Common Tasks? http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/ Outlook 2007: http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2007/ Outlook Tips by email: Exchange Messaging Outlook newsletter: Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/ Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com You can access this newsgroup by visiting http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...s/default.mspx or point your newsreader to msnews.microsoft.com. "Robbzilla" wrote in message ... I have a user who's been migrated to a new machine. Her old one was a Dell GX270 with about 256MB RAM and XP SP2 and Outlook 2003. The new HP has the same software, but has 2GB RAM and is a new dual-core job. The user has 563 PSTs. I wish I were exagerrating. She literally has some of these with 1 email in them. She has all of them "opened" in outlook (By that I mean she has them loaded, but not all are expanded). And... surprise, surprise, she's getting a lot of corruption in the PSTs, giving her problems opening emails and personal folders constantly. Here's the kicker: The original machine runs them just fine. It's old and slow, but it chugs along and doesn't seem plagued with this issue. She has all of the files open in the same manner, and works. Intensely frustrating, let me tell you. She refuses to believe that having 563 PSTs open is a bad thing because they work on the old machine. So, has anyone ever seen anything of this caliber? Any suggestions? The obvious one of "Close them" isn't an option at this time, and merging them down isn't either. This user claims not to have time, and keeps referring back to the old machine where her setup has worked for 3 years. -- Robbzilla |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes. It's a corporate image, completely controlled and not allowing users to make many changes. No addins running either. The files are all locally stored on her HD and no roaming profiles are used.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[quote='Diane Poremsky [MVP];297031']http://support.microsoft.com/kb/907651 - it was added to SP3 so you should
have it installed if everything is truly identical except for the hardware. Actually, I apologize. I should have stated that I attempted this already, with very limited success... The quick answer is for the user to combine PSTs. But she's very resistant to this and is also high enough up on the food chain to make it difficult to force her to comply. She's had 4 or 5 techs telling her for over a year not to work the way she's working, and now we're getting to a point where she's setting herself up for a really bad time. I'm not looking forward to dealing with this system when it goes down... As of now, she's kept her old PC and we're going to re-image the new PC and start all over again... I suspect we won't have much better luck than we already have. But then, maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised! |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Taking settings across PSTs | John[_11_] | Outlook - General Queries | 9 | January 30th 09 12:29 PM |
Pfbackup corrupts psts. | Celtic | Outlook - General Queries | 10 | February 22nd 08 03:12 PM |
PRF problem with password protected PSTs | Groupex1 | Outlook - Installation | 0 | October 29th 07 07:35 PM |
Problems transferring calendar between PSTs | Jason | Outlook - Calandaring | 2 | October 16th 07 01:00 PM |
Bloated Archive PSTs | win_cpp | Outlook - General Queries | 5 | October 13th 06 03:36 AM |