A Microsoft Outlook email forum. Outlook Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Outlook Banter forum » Microsoft Outlook Email Newsgroups » Outlook - General Queries
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

should I run Outlook 2003 Junk Mail and Norton AntiSpam



 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 24th 06, 07:58 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
pandreae
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default should I run Outlook 2003 Junk Mail and Norton AntiSpam

I just loaded the demo version of outlook 2003 and have both AnitSpam 2006
from Symantec and Junk Mail filters. Is this a good idea or should I turn
one of them off.
Ads
  #2  
Old January 24th 06, 08:11 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
Brian Tillman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17,452
Default should I run Outlook 2003 Junk Mail and Norton AntiSpam

pandreae wrote:

I just loaded the demo version of outlook 2003 and have both AnitSpam
2006 from Symantec and Junk Mail filters. Is this a good idea or
should I turn one of them off.


I'd opt for eliminating the Symantec product.
--
Brian Tillman
  #3  
Old March 11th 06, 05:41 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
c7sparks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default should I run Outlook 2003 Junk Mail and Norton AntiSpam

I agree...lose Symantec, but don't rely solely on Outlook's limited
capability either. Get an anti-spam program that is trainable, easy to use,
and free...like SpayBayes...to work with Outlook 2003.

"Brian Tillman" wrote:

pandreae wrote:

I just loaded the demo version of outlook 2003 and have both AnitSpam
2006 from Symantec and Junk Mail filters. Is this a good idea or
should I turn one of them off.


I'd opt for eliminating the Symantec product.
--
Brian Tillman

  #4  
Old March 13th 06, 02:02 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
pandreae
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default should I run Outlook 2003 Junk Mail and Norton AntiSpam

I ended up decidding to run both Norton Anti-spam and Junk Mail. A little
more work but effective at blocking emails.

"c7sparks" wrote:

I agree...lose Symantec, but don't rely solely on Outlook's limited
capability either. Get an anti-spam program that is trainable, easy to use,
and free...like SpayBayes...to work with Outlook 2003.

"Brian Tillman" wrote:

pandreae wrote:

I just loaded the demo version of outlook 2003 and have both AnitSpam
2006 from Symantec and Junk Mail filters. Is this a good idea or
should I turn one of them off.


I'd opt for eliminating the Symantec product.
--
Brian Tillman

 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rule doesn't run automatically [email protected] Outlook - General Queries 5 January 24th 06 03:21 PM
Outlook 2003 - automatically mark all Junk email as "read" Ric Outlook - General Queries 8 January 19th 06 01:52 PM
Junk E-Mail PapaBear Outlook - General Queries 1 January 18th 06 10:17 AM
Emptying Junk E-mail Folder Armstrong Wong Outlook - General Queries 0 January 13th 06 07:04 AM
Junk Email and Conflicts StevenH Outlook - General Queries 0 January 10th 06 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Outlook Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.