A Microsoft Outlook email forum. Outlook Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Outlook Banter forum » Microsoft Outlook Express Email Newsgroup » Outlook Express
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan



 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 6th 09, 04:19 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
Dori A Schmetterling
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 220
Default Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan

I am well aware of the majority expert opinion here about e-mail scanning:
DON'T.

(And I have switched mine off as a consequence.)

Today I received notice of a webcast on hosted e-mail, which includes these
subjects:

QUOTE
Here are a few examples of what hosted email security provides you:

- One fixed price per user gives you unlimited email scanning capacity

- The solution is continuously tuned and updated by your security vendor

- Reduced overhead means lower costs for mail servers and network bandwidth.
UNQUOTE


The sender is PC Magazine (USA), thus a respectable source. The sponsor is
Trend Micro, so they have a vested interest...

Note the emphasis on "unlimited email scanning capacity."

Why would PC Mag waste its time? Or maybe somebody will suggest it is a
waste of time...

DAS
--
To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling"
---



Ads
  #2  
Old August 6th 09, 04:36 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
Bruce Hagen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,210
Default Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan

QP
- One fixed price per user
/QP

There's your answer.
--

Bruce Hagen
MS-MVP [Mail]
Imperial Beach, CA


"Dori A Schmetterling" wrote in message
...
I am well aware of the majority expert opinion here about e-mail scanning:
DON'T.

(And I have switched mine off as a consequence.)

Today I received notice of a webcast on hosted e-mail, which includes
these
subjects:

QUOTE
Here are a few examples of what hosted email security provides you:

- One fixed price per user gives you unlimited email scanning capacity

- The solution is continuously tuned and updated by your security vendor

- Reduced overhead means lower costs for mail servers and network
bandwidth.
UNQUOTE


The sender is PC Magazine (USA), thus a respectable source. The sponsor
is
Trend Micro, so they have a vested interest...

Note the emphasis on "unlimited email scanning capacity."

Why would PC Mag waste its time? Or maybe somebody will suggest it is a
waste of time...

DAS
--
To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling"
---




  #3  
Old August 6th 09, 04:36 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
Bruce Hagen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,210
Default Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan

QP
- One fixed price per user
/QP

There's your answer.
--

Bruce Hagen
MS-MVP [Mail]
Imperial Beach, CA


"Dori A Schmetterling" wrote in message
...
I am well aware of the majority expert opinion here about e-mail scanning:
DON'T.

(And I have switched mine off as a consequence.)

Today I received notice of a webcast on hosted e-mail, which includes
these
subjects:

QUOTE
Here are a few examples of what hosted email security provides you:

- One fixed price per user gives you unlimited email scanning capacity

- The solution is continuously tuned and updated by your security vendor

- Reduced overhead means lower costs for mail servers and network
bandwidth.
UNQUOTE


The sender is PC Magazine (USA), thus a respectable source. The sponsor
is
Trend Micro, so they have a vested interest...

Note the emphasis on "unlimited email scanning capacity."

Why would PC Mag waste its time? Or maybe somebody will suggest it is a
waste of time...

DAS
--
To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling"
---




  #4  
Old August 6th 09, 04:48 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
Dori A Schmetterling
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 220
Default Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan

True...

DAS

To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling"
---
"Bruce Hagen" wrote in message
...
QP
- One fixed price per user
/QP

There's your answer.
--

Bruce Hagen
MS-MVP [Mail]
Imperial Beach, CA


"Dori A Schmetterling" wrote in message
...
I am well aware of the majority expert opinion here about e-mail scanning:
DON'T.

(And I have switched mine off as a consequence.)

Today I received notice of a webcast on hosted e-mail, which includes
these
subjects:

QUOTE
Here are a few examples of what hosted email security provides you:

- One fixed price per user gives you unlimited email scanning capacity

- The solution is continuously tuned and updated by your security vendor

- Reduced overhead means lower costs for mail servers and network
bandwidth.
UNQUOTE


The sender is PC Magazine (USA), thus a respectable source. The sponsor
is
Trend Micro, so they have a vested interest...

Note the emphasis on "unlimited email scanning capacity."

Why would PC Mag waste its time? Or maybe somebody will suggest it is a
waste of time...

DAS
--
To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling"
---






  #5  
Old August 6th 09, 04:48 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
Dori A Schmetterling
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 220
Default Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan

True...

DAS

To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling"
---
"Bruce Hagen" wrote in message
...
QP
- One fixed price per user
/QP

There's your answer.
--

Bruce Hagen
MS-MVP [Mail]
Imperial Beach, CA


"Dori A Schmetterling" wrote in message
...
I am well aware of the majority expert opinion here about e-mail scanning:
DON'T.

(And I have switched mine off as a consequence.)

Today I received notice of a webcast on hosted e-mail, which includes
these
subjects:

QUOTE
Here are a few examples of what hosted email security provides you:

- One fixed price per user gives you unlimited email scanning capacity

- The solution is continuously tuned and updated by your security vendor

- Reduced overhead means lower costs for mail servers and network
bandwidth.
UNQUOTE


The sender is PC Magazine (USA), thus a respectable source. The sponsor
is
Trend Micro, so they have a vested interest...

Note the emphasis on "unlimited email scanning capacity."

Why would PC Mag waste its time? Or maybe somebody will suggest it is a
waste of time...

DAS
--
To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling"
---






  #6  
Old August 6th 09, 05:23 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
Corday
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 89
Default Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan

And it slows everything down.
--
I mastered Wordstar graphics!


"Dori A Schmetterling" wrote:

True...

DAS

To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling"
---
"Bruce Hagen" wrote in message
...
QP
- One fixed price per user
/QP

There's your answer.
--

Bruce Hagen
MS-MVP [Mail]
Imperial Beach, CA


"Dori A Schmetterling" wrote in message
...
I am well aware of the majority expert opinion here about e-mail scanning:
DON'T.

(And I have switched mine off as a consequence.)

Today I received notice of a webcast on hosted e-mail, which includes
these
subjects:

QUOTE
Here are a few examples of what hosted email security provides you:

- One fixed price per user gives you unlimited email scanning capacity

- The solution is continuously tuned and updated by your security vendor

- Reduced overhead means lower costs for mail servers and network
bandwidth.
UNQUOTE


The sender is PC Magazine (USA), thus a respectable source. The sponsor
is
Trend Micro, so they have a vested interest...

Note the emphasis on "unlimited email scanning capacity."

Why would PC Mag waste its time? Or maybe somebody will suggest it is a
waste of time...

DAS
--
To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling"
---







  #7  
Old August 6th 09, 05:23 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
Corday
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 89
Default Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan

And it slows everything down.
--
I mastered Wordstar graphics!


"Dori A Schmetterling" wrote:

True...

DAS

To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling"
---
"Bruce Hagen" wrote in message
...
QP
- One fixed price per user
/QP

There's your answer.
--

Bruce Hagen
MS-MVP [Mail]
Imperial Beach, CA


"Dori A Schmetterling" wrote in message
...
I am well aware of the majority expert opinion here about e-mail scanning:
DON'T.

(And I have switched mine off as a consequence.)

Today I received notice of a webcast on hosted e-mail, which includes
these
subjects:

QUOTE
Here are a few examples of what hosted email security provides you:

- One fixed price per user gives you unlimited email scanning capacity

- The solution is continuously tuned and updated by your security vendor

- Reduced overhead means lower costs for mail servers and network
bandwidth.
UNQUOTE


The sender is PC Magazine (USA), thus a respectable source. The sponsor
is
Trend Micro, so they have a vested interest...

Note the emphasis on "unlimited email scanning capacity."

Why would PC Mag waste its time? Or maybe somebody will suggest it is a
waste of time...

DAS
--
To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling"
---







  #8  
Old August 7th 09, 01:22 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
Twayne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 163
Default Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan

"Corday" wrote in message

And it slows everything down.
--
I mastered Wordstar graphics!


Long live the WS diamond!


  #9  
Old August 7th 09, 01:22 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
Twayne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 163
Default Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan


"Corday" wrote in message

And it slows everything down.
--
I mastered Wordstar graphics!


Long live the WS diamond!


 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Scan Pst Log? its_my_dime Outlook - General Queries 1 November 10th 08 05:09 PM
Configuring Outlook to Scan to E-mail Lacy Outlook Express 5 December 20th 07 01:12 AM
card scan rena212 Outlook - Using Contacts 0 April 5th 07 04:26 PM
Scan to E Mail Ricsec Outlook - General Queries 6 June 10th 06 11:15 PM
Scan to E Mail Ricsec Outlook - General Queries 1 June 8th 06 10:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2024 Outlook Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.