![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: change, composing, display, email, names, select |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am trying to view my contacts when I am composing a new email; under the
select names, display as, from first name first to last name first. Is this at all possible? Everywhere else contacts are viewed by last name, except here. When I go to compose a new email message, using my business contact list, I come up with SMTP and FAX information; I just want the email addresses to come up. Any help would be greatly appreciated. These two issues are driving my boss nuts! |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Your Outlook version would be helpful.
The most frequent question asked about the Outlook Address Book is "why won't it sort the way I told it to?" Simple answer. Even though we all know that our Outlook Address Book is simply a view of our Contacts, Microsoft did not configure it to abide by the settings we chose for our Contacts. Instead, they hid the sort settings for the Outlook Address Book where no one could ever find them. Depending on your version and mail support mode of Outlook, you can sort the Outlook Address Book this way: 98/2000 in Corporate/Workgroup mode: Tools menu Services Highlight the Outlook Address Book service Click Properties Set sort order 98/2000 Internet Mail Only: Tools menu Address Book View menu Sort by Outlook 2002/2003: Go to Tools E-mail accounts View or change existing directories or address books Outlook Address Book Change. Set your sort order there Note that your options are only to sort by "First, Last" or by "File As." So if you want your Outlook Address Book to sort by "Last, First," or by "Company" you must have your Contacts' File As fields configured that way. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Change Order of 'display as' names" Change Order of 'display as' wrote in message news ![]() I am trying to view my contacts when I am composing a new email; under the select names, display as, from first name first to last name first. Is this at all possible? Everywhere else contacts are viewed by last name, except here. When I go to compose a new email message, using my business contact list, I come up with SMTP and FAX information; I just want the email addresses to come up. Any help would be greatly appreciated. These two issues are driving my boss nuts! |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm so sorry - I am using Outlook 2003 and thanks so much for the help.
Any ideas on this issue: When I go to compose a new email message, using my business contact list, I come up with SMTP and FAX information; I just want the email addresses to come up. Can I get rid of the lines with the fax numbers so they don't appear. There are too many to go through each time. Debbie "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: Your Outlook version would be helpful. The most frequent question asked about the Outlook Address Book is "why won't it sort the way I told it to?" Simple answer. Even though we all know that our Outlook Address Book is simply a view of our Contacts, Microsoft did not configure it to abide by the settings we chose for our Contacts. Instead, they hid the sort settings for the Outlook Address Book where no one could ever find them. Depending on your version and mail support mode of Outlook, you can sort the Outlook Address Book this way: 98/2000 in Corporate/Workgroup mode: Tools menu Services Highlight the Outlook Address Book service Click Properties Set sort order 98/2000 Internet Mail Only: Tools menu Address Book View menu Sort by Outlook 2002/2003: Go to Tools E-mail accounts View or change existing directories or address books Outlook Address Book Change. Set your sort order there Note that your options are only to sort by "First, Last" or by "File As." So if you want your Outlook Address Book to sort by "Last, First," or by "Company" you must have your Contacts' File As fields configured that way. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Change Order of 'display as' names" Change Order of 'display as' wrote in message news ![]() I am trying to view my contacts when I am composing a new email; under the select names, display as, from first name first to last name first. Is this at all possible? Everywhere else contacts are viewed by last name, except here. When I go to compose a new email message, using my business contact list, I come up with SMTP and FAX information; I just want the email addresses to come up. Any help would be greatly appreciated. These two issues are driving my boss nuts! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Outlook considers fax numbers to be valid electronic addresses, since there
are many client- and server-based components that can use such addresses. One method to hide fax numbers from the address book is to prefix the fax number with one or more letters (maybe B for business fax, H for home, O for other). If the fax number begins with a letter, Outlook won't show it in the address book. There are a couple of utilities that can help you hide fax numbers from the address book. See: http://www.rsoutlook.com/us/rshifa.htm http://www.sperrysoftware.com/Outlook_Solutions.htm (Hide Fax Numbers) http://www.mapilab.com/outlook/toolbox/ Another way to avoid having fax numbers appear in the address book is simply not to enter data in the fax fields. Put fax numbers in some other (non-phone) fields. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Change Order of ''display as'' names" .com wrote in message ... I'm so sorry - I am using Outlook 2003 and thanks so much for the help. Any ideas on this issue: When I go to compose a new email message, using my business contact list, I come up with SMTP and FAX information; I just want the email addresses to come up. Can I get rid of the lines with the fax numbers so they don't appear. There are too many to go through each time. Debbie "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: Your Outlook version would be helpful. The most frequent question asked about the Outlook Address Book is "why won't it sort the way I told it to?" Simple answer. Even though we all know that our Outlook Address Book is simply a view of our Contacts, Microsoft did not configure it to abide by the settings we chose for our Contacts. Instead, they hid the sort settings for the Outlook Address Book where no one could ever find them. Depending on your version and mail support mode of Outlook, you can sort the Outlook Address Book this way: 98/2000 in Corporate/Workgroup mode: Tools menu Services Highlight the Outlook Address Book service Click Properties Set sort order 98/2000 Internet Mail Only: Tools menu Address Book View menu Sort by Outlook 2002/2003: Go to Tools E-mail accounts View or change existing directories or address books Outlook Address Book Change. Set your sort order there Note that your options are only to sort by "First, Last" or by "File As." So if you want your Outlook Address Book to sort by "Last, First," or by "Company" you must have your Contacts' File As fields configured that way. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Change Order of 'display as' names" Change Order of 'display as' wrote in message news ![]() I am trying to view my contacts when I am composing a new email; under the select names, display as, from first name first to last name first. Is this at all possible? Everywhere else contacts are viewed by last name, except here. When I go to compose a new email message, using my business contact list, I come up with SMTP and FAX information; I just want the email addresses to come up. Any help would be greatly appreciated. These two issues are driving my boss nuts! |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for your help with the Outlook 2003 Contact issues I had. Here’s a
link I found that doesn’t cost anything In regard to the fax number issues. http://support.microsoft.com/default...b/305361/en-us "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: Outlook considers fax numbers to be valid electronic addresses, since there are many client- and server-based components that can use such addresses. One method to hide fax numbers from the address book is to prefix the fax number with one or more letters (maybe B for business fax, H for home, O for other). If the fax number begins with a letter, Outlook won't show it in the address book. There are a couple of utilities that can help you hide fax numbers from the address book. See: http://www.rsoutlook.com/us/rshifa.htm http://www.sperrysoftware.com/Outlook_Solutions.htm (Hide Fax Numbers) http://www.mapilab.com/outlook/toolbox/ Another way to avoid having fax numbers appear in the address book is simply not to enter data in the fax fields. Put fax numbers in some other (non-phone) fields. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Change Order of ''display as'' names" .com wrote in message ... I'm so sorry - I am using Outlook 2003 and thanks so much for the help. Any ideas on this issue: When I go to compose a new email message, using my business contact list, I come up with SMTP and FAX information; I just want the email addresses to come up. Can I get rid of the lines with the fax numbers so they don't appear. There are too many to go through each time. Debbie "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: Your Outlook version would be helpful. The most frequent question asked about the Outlook Address Book is "why won't it sort the way I told it to?" Simple answer. Even though we all know that our Outlook Address Book is simply a view of our Contacts, Microsoft did not configure it to abide by the settings we chose for our Contacts. Instead, they hid the sort settings for the Outlook Address Book where no one could ever find them. Depending on your version and mail support mode of Outlook, you can sort the Outlook Address Book this way: 98/2000 in Corporate/Workgroup mode: Tools menu Services Highlight the Outlook Address Book service Click Properties Set sort order 98/2000 Internet Mail Only: Tools menu Address Book View menu Sort by Outlook 2002/2003: Go to Tools E-mail accounts View or change existing directories or address books Outlook Address Book Change. Set your sort order there Note that your options are only to sort by "First, Last" or by "File As." So if you want your Outlook Address Book to sort by "Last, First," or by "Company" you must have your Contacts' File As fields configured that way. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Change Order of 'display as' names" Change Order of 'display as' wrote in message news
I am trying to view my contacts when I am composing a new email; under the select names, display as, from first name first to last name first. Is this at all possible? Everywhere else contacts are viewed by last name, except here. When I go to compose a new email message, using my business contact list, I come up with SMTP and FAX information; I just want the email addresses to come up. Any help would be greatly appreciated. These two issues are driving my boss nuts! |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Change Order of ''display as'' names
.com wrote: Thanks for your help with the Outlook 2003 Contact issues I had. Here’s a link I found that doesn’t cost anything In regard to the fax number issues. And Russ's first suggestion to you about prefixing the fax number with an alphabetic also didn't cost anything and would have worked as well as the method described in the article you cited. -- Brian Tillman |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Outlook Contacts Select Names - do not display E-mail Type: FAX | palzie | Outlook - Using Contacts | 2 | April 9th 07 10:56 PM |
| How display show FROM address when composing EMAIL? | pattyjamas@hotmail.com | Outlook - General Queries | 3 | February 26th 07 06:45 PM |
| Can't Select Contact Names for Email | tdunne | Outlook - Using Contacts | 1 | November 7th 06 07:22 PM |
| contact display/lookup composing email | Rob | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | October 25th 06 08:48 PM |
| Sort/Find by "Display Name" on Select Names screen in Address Bk | Bob Schorr | Outlook - Using Contacts | 0 | June 28th 06 10:31 PM |