A Microsoft Outlook email forum. Outlook Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Outlook Banter forum » Microsoft Outlook Email Newsgroups » Outlook - Installation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , ,

ETA on performance improvements to Outlook 2007?





 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 26th 06, 03:58 AM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.installation
Jeff Burke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default ETA on performance improvements to Outlook 2007?


Hi,

I am running Outlook 2007 (non-beta, 12.0.4518.1014) on a relatively new
laptop (Thinkpad T60p, 2.16GHz, 2GB RAM, XP), with all extensions turned off,
RSS unused, one exchange and one POP account. WDS 3 / Instant Search are
NOT installed.

I have a 4.6GB OST (Exchange 03) and two PSTs, of 2.5GB and 0.7GB in size.
My job and my personality require me to have relatively ready access to a
large number of historic emails, and Outlook 2003 had NO problems with this.

I like the interface and some of the new features of Outlook 2007. I thought
Instant Search would be very useful but uninstalled it in an effort to speed
things up. But it is wonderfully, terribly, horribly slow. Starting new
messages, moving messages between folders, send and receive, inserting
pictures into HTML messages all involve a 1-5 second lag - as does pretty
much everything but typing text into a Plain Text message while nothing else
is happening.

Before I uninstall, go back to Outlook 2003 and install Google Desktop
Search, could someone tell me if there's hope on the horizon for Service Pack
that will improve performance, or a silver bullet tweak to make this better?

I have already spent hours defragging the hard drive, eliminating some mail,
chasing around some performance tweaks (turning off extensions helped), etc.

I find it hard to believe that the only advice (after "Turn off all
extensions") for most new users is "Archive your mail", when Outlook 2003 did
just fine with very large mailboxes. Several people that I know have similar
size mailboxes and archiving mail to a place where it is either unsearchable
or in a different hierarchy of folders is untenable. We are also folks that
don't want to tolerate unresponsive applications for things as simple as
sending mail. Do testers for this software have only the fastest machines
and smallest mailboxes?

What do we do??

When will this be fixed??

Thanks!

Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slow performance while accessing Outlook item fields using VSTO Maxim Add-ins for Outlook 3 November 16th 06 04:08 PM
Suggestions: Contact Database Improvements imafellow@gmail.com Outlook - Using Contacts 0 April 6th 06 01:07 AM
how to improve performance of Outlook Raj Menon Outlook - Installation 3 February 27th 06 04:25 PM
Outlook 2003 performance and activity log Sergio Outlook - General Queries 0 January 30th 06 09:52 AM
How to monitor Outlook 2003 performance/health Sergio Outlook - General Queries 0 January 27th 06 10:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2009 Outlook Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
eBay - Credit Cards - Bad Credit Mortgages - McDonalds - 0 Credit Cards