![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: 2007, desktop, outlook, search |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
From what I've read, Outlook 2007 will make the installation of Windows
Desktop Search mandatory, and will use that technology to search emails. Seems that WDS is basically the 'Indexing service' on steroids, in other words a daemon that compiles a database of search-information in the background, when the computer is otherwise idle. Just occurs to me though, if that 's how it works, then surely it would be a pretty useless way to search emails; if I (say) want to find all emails from a particular person, then I want the ones I've just received 30sec ago to be included. If the recent ones aren't yet indexed (because the computer has never been idle since their arrival) then would it include them? Or not? In this respect, email is fundamentally different from an archive of files. Does anyone know, have the coders taken this into account? |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
My experience is that the index results will warn you if there are unindexed messages and will suggest that you might want to wait a while. I've seen that message only a couple of times in more than a year's use of Outlook 2007. The background indexer seems to find plenty of opportunity to keep the index up to date.
As a practical matter, most people can see and locate the mail they got 30 seconds ago just fine. It's the mail they got 30 days ago that this new search feature is meant to address. -- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "Ian" wrote in message ... From what I've read, Outlook 2007 will make the installation of Windows Desktop Search mandatory, and will use that technology to search emails. Seems that WDS is basically the 'Indexing service' on steroids, in other words a daemon that compiles a database of search-information in the background, when the computer is otherwise idle. Just occurs to me though, if that 's how it works, then surely it would be a pretty useless way to search emails; if I (say) want to find all emails from a particular person, then I want the ones I've just received 30sec ago to be included. If the recent ones aren't yet indexed (because the computer has never been idle since their arrival) then would it include them? Or not? In this respect, email is fundamentally different from an archive of files. Does anyone know, have the coders taken this into account? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Desktop Search in Outlook 2007 beta 2 | Lady Veteran | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | September 16th 06 12:22 AM |
| Outlook should do a multiple letter search like Palm Desktop | Randall Berinhout | Outlook - Using Contacts | 1 | August 27th 06 02:13 PM |
| Desktop Search update for Outlook 12 | infoseeker_edward | Outlook - Installation | 4 | July 1st 06 01:48 PM |
| Outlook 2007 / Desktop Search | kw6575 | Outlook - Installation | 1 | June 2nd 06 03:30 PM |
| Beta 2007 Outlook and Desktop Search | JimF | Outlook - Installation | 1 | May 27th 06 04:21 AM |