![]() |
|
Inserted pictures
Whenever I receive email which as inserted pictures in the body of the
text, the pictures always show up as attachment and do not show up in the body of the email. How can I get Outlook to display incoming email the way it was meant to be seen? -- Dena Jo Email goes to denajo2 at the dot com variation of the Yahoo domain. Plonk the *******s: http://www.panix.com/~mwsm/trolls.html |
Inserted pictures
Outlook 2007 will add image preview to the reading pane. Earlier versions rely on the sender constructing the message with an embedded image rather than attachment.
-- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "Dena Jo" wrote in message ... Whenever I receive email which as inserted pictures in the body of the text, the pictures always show up as attachment and do not show up in the body of the email. How can I get Outlook to display incoming email the way it was meant to be seen? -- Dena Jo Email goes to denajo2 at the dot com variation of the Yahoo domain. Plonk the *******s: http://www.panix.com/~mwsm/trolls.html |
Inserted pictures
On 27 May 2006, Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] posted thus:
Outlook 2007 will add image preview to the reading pane. Earlier versions rely on the sender constructing the message with an embedded image rather than attachment. Do they need any beta testers for it now? I just can't stand the image situation in Outlook. -- Dena Jo Email goes to denajo2 at the dot com variation of the Yahoo domain. Plonk the *******s: http://www.panix.com/~mwsm/trolls.html |
Inserted pictures
http://www.microsoft.com/office/preview/
-- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "Dena Jo" wrote in message ... On 27 May 2006, Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] posted thus: Outlook 2007 will add image preview to the reading pane. Earlier versions rely on the sender constructing the message with an embedded image rather than attachment. Do they need any beta testers for it now? I just can't stand the image situation in Outlook. -- Dena Jo Email goes to denajo2 at the dot com variation of the Yahoo domain. Plonk the *******s: http://www.panix.com/~mwsm/trolls.html |
Inserted pictures
"Dena Jo" wrote in message
... Whenever I receive email which as inserted pictures in the body of the text, the pictures always show up as attachment and do not show up in the body of the email. How can I get Outlook to display incoming the way it was meant to be seen? Well, tell your sender of those critical pictures to insert the pictures within the body of the message (disposition=inline) rather than attaching them (disposition=attached). Look at the raw code of the e-mail and notice in the MIME part what is its disposition. If the sender doesn't insert or paste the picture using whatever e-mail program that they happen to use then you get to see it exactly how they constructed it. -- __________________________________________________ Post replies to the newsgroup. Share with others. For e-mail: Remove "NIX" and add "#VN" to Subject. __________________________________________________ |
Inserted pictures
On 27 May 2006, Vanguard posted thus:
Well, tell your sender of those critical pictures to insert the pictures within the body of the message (disposition=inline) rather than attaching them (disposition=attached). Look at the raw code of the e-mail and notice in the MIME part what is its disposition. If the sender doesn't insert or paste the picture using whatever e-mail program that they happen to use then you get to see it exactly how they constructed it. I inserted (not attached) a picture and sent it to myself, and it still showed up as an attachment. -- Dena Jo Email goes to denajo2 at the dot com variation of the Yahoo domain. Plonk the *******s: http://www.panix.com/~mwsm/trolls.html |
Inserted pictures
"Dena Jo" wrote in message
... On 27 May 2006, Vanguard posted thus: Well, tell your sender of those critical pictures to insert the pictures within the body of the message (disposition=inline) rather than attaching them (disposition=attached). Look at the raw code of the e-mail and notice in the MIME part what is its disposition. If the sender doesn't insert or paste the picture using whatever e-mail program that they happen to use then you get to see it exactly how they constructed it. I inserted (not attached) a picture and sent it to myself, and it still showed up as an attachment. What format? Text, HTML, or RTF? -- __________________________________________________ Post replies to the newsgroup. Share with others. For e-mail: Remove "NIX" and add "#VN" to Subject. __________________________________________________ |
Inserted pictures
On 27 May 2006, Vanguard posted thus:
What format? Text, HTML, or RTF? HTML. -- Dena Jo Email goes to denajo2 at the dot com variation of the Yahoo domain. Plonk the *******s: http://www.panix.com/~mwsm/trolls.html |
Inserted pictures
"Dena Jo" wrote in message
... Vanguard posted: What format? Text, HTML, or RTF? HTML. I just did a test where I used the Insert - Picture menu while composing an HTML-formatted e-mail. I use the Outlook embedded e-mail editor. I do NOT have Outlook call and load Word to use Word as the e-mail editor. The picture showed between some lines of text. After sending it and retrieving it, the picture was still within the body of the HTML-formatted e-mail, so it looked the same way as I sent it and how it looked when I composed it. I am using Outlook 2002. You didn't mention WHICH version you use. -- __________________________________________________ Post replies to the newsgroup. Share with others. For e-mail: Remove "NIX" and add "#VN" to Subject. __________________________________________________ |
Inserted pictures
On 30 May 2006, Vanguard posted thus:
I just did a test where I used the Insert - Picture menu while composing an HTML-formatted e-mail. I use the Outlook embedded e-mail editor. I do NOT have Outlook call and load Word to use Word as the e-mail editor. The picture showed between some lines of text. After sending it and retrieving it, the picture was still within the body of the HTML-formatted e-mail, so it looked the same way as I sent it and how it looked when I composed it. I am using Outlook 2002. You didn't mention WHICH version you use. Outlook 2003. -- Dena Jo Email goes to denajo2 at the dot com variation of the Yahoo domain. Plonk the *******s: http://www.panix.com/~mwsm/trolls.html |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:35 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 OutlookBanter.com