![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I have a strange problem, when someone send to a user (on which i have the problem) a meeting request, some people in the company received this request too. In the AD, I saw these users were on the "send behalf" property for the user on which i have the problem. I deleted the users list for this property, but i still had this problem, i thought it might be a problem of synchronisattion, so i waited 2 or 3 days, but the problem was still the same. I checked the property of this user with ADSIEDIT but i didn't see any property with the users list. I don't know how to resolve this problem. Thank you very much for your futurs responses |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of my users has this problem also. It must be to do with the send on behalf of option, as my user had the affected recipients in their AD send on behalf of field also. Did you check the delegates tab on the clients outlook options? I believe that can do the same thing. I am going to try removing the send on behalf in AD, although the user wants that setting they would rather not waste other peoples time by having them turn up to meetings thaey dont need to be at! Will let you know how i got on. It is very strange that it would do this! I am using SBS2003 running exchange.
EggHeadCafe.com - .NET Developer Portal of Choice http://www.eggheadcafe.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok so i have removed the users from the send on behalf field of the affected user. But still this is what happens. User A sends request to B. User A gets the request come back to them asking them to accept on behalf of user B! Before that user C was getting the request 'sent on behalf of' user B. Is that the same as you? I am convinced that this is some weird bug as after questioning the users they say that they do not actually use the send on behalf function at all. I am the only one who could have put it there...
EggHeadCafe.com - .NET Developer Portal of Choice http://www.eggheadcafe.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok so here is what the problem was. In the delegates tab of the user the requests were being sent on behalf of... there are a list of users who will have have rights to their calender. In properties there is a tick box that sends an email to that person for entries into the calendar. Unticking this fixed my problem! So user A was sending the request to user B, They clicked accept causing the entry to appear in their calendar. Then due to the mentioned tickbox for user A and C in user B's delegate tab. They were sent the acceptance email. Not sure if that makes sense, the user stared at me blankly when i tried to explain. Thanks for your post helped my train of thought. Hope this fixes it for you too!
EggHeadCafe.com - .NET Developer Portal of Choice http://www.eggheadcafe.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okay - so here is the REAL problem. Egghead Cafe posters do not have a clue, no money to buy one, and never include the post to which they are replying, which makes them look like idiots.
-- Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without reading. After furious head scratching, Sam Speight asked: | Ok so here is what the problem was. In the delegates tab of the user | the requests were being sent on behalf of... there are a list of | users who will have have rights to their calender. In properties | there is a tick box that sends an email to that person for entries | into the calendar. Unticking this fixed my problem! So user A was | sending the request to user B, They clicked accept causing the entry | to appear in their calendar. Then due to the mentioned tickbox for | user A and C in user B's delegate tab. They were sent the acceptance | email. Not sure if that makes sense, the user stared at me blankly | when i tried to explain. Thanks for your post helped my train of | thought. Hope this fixes it for you too! | | EggHeadCafe.com - .NET Developer Portal of Choice | http://www.eggheadcafe.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please do not keep repeating this useless repetitive non- response.
-- Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without reading. After furious head scratching, sam asked: | One of my users has this problem also. It must be to do with the send | on behalf of option, as my user had the affected recipients in their | AD send on behalf of field also. Did you check the delegates tab on | the clients outlook options? I believe that can do the same thing. I | am going to try removing the send on behalf in AD, although the user | wants that setting they would rather not waste other peoples time by | having them turn up to meetings thaey dont need to be at! Will let | you know how i got on. It is very strange that it would do this! I am | using SBS2003 running exchange. | | EggHeadCafe.com - .NET Developer Portal of Choice | http://www.eggheadcafe.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sam Speight wrote in message ...
Ok so i have removed the users from the send on behalf field of the affected user. But still this is what happens. User A sends request to B. User A gets the request come back to them asking them to accept on behalf of user B! Before that user C was getting the request 'sent on behalf of' user B. Is that the same as you? I am convinced that this is some weird bug as after questioning the users they say that they do not actually use the send on behalf function at all. I am the only one who could have put it there... EggHeadCafe.com - .NET Developer Portal of Choice http://www.eggheadcafe.com To whom are you talking and about what? Please note: This is NOT a chat room and You are NOT posting to a forum run by Eggheadcafe - you are actually posting to a global Usenet Newsgroup. You will get a far better experience if you use a newsreader and subscribe to these groups directly, rather than through Eggheadcafe. If you must stay with Egghheadcafe then please follow Usenet custom by quoting the post you are replying to, replying to the thread, and do not change the subject line. Thank you. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You didn't say which is "the affected user." The symptoms suggest that A is B's delegate.
-- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx Sam Speight wrote in message ... Ok so i have removed the users from the send on behalf field of the affected user. But still this is what happens. User A sends request to B. User A gets the request come back to them asking them to accept on behalf of user B! Before that user C was getting the request 'sent on behalf of' user B. Is that the same as you? I am convinced that this is some weird bug as after questioning the users they say that they do not actually use the send on behalf function at all. I am the only one who could have put it there... EggHeadCafe.com - .NET Developer Portal of Choice http://www.eggheadcafe.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Updated meeting request received as "Canceled" | Richard Poon | Outlook - Calandaring | 0 | October 30th 06 05:19 PM |
invite people to a meeting that I've received | JGT | Outlook - Calandaring | 4 | May 23rd 06 05:02 PM |
Hi people views once what I received: | Money salary - program | Outlook Express | 1 | April 18th 06 06:28 PM |
Hi people views once what I received: | Money salary - program | Outlook Express | 0 | April 18th 06 05:42 PM |
Hi people views once what I received: | Money salary - program | Outlook Express | 0 | April 18th 06 05:42 PM |