Barry H White wrote:

If DLs are not reliable and become corrupt, why does Microsoft
include them in its system. I have wasted lots of time on this, and
thing this stinks.

For the most part, if you never have to move your data store anywhere, DLs
tend to work well enough. SOme people never have problems and some do. For
example, I have one DL that works well unless I'm foolish enough to click
"Update Now". Then I have to manually repair the DL because I get X.500
addresses substituted for some of the members' Internet addresses even
though most of them have that style of address available. The X.500
addresses produce a sending error.
--
Brian Tillman