View Single Post
  #4  
Old March 25th 07, 03:01 AM posted to microsoft.public.outlook
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,520
Default Outlook 2002 Distribution List failure

Categories or separate Contact subfolders are what most use in place of
DL's.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Ray Rogers" wrote in message
...
If you don't use DL's, what do you use?
I ask this because we are in the process of setting up a listing of our
members which we will use for e-mailing. I'd have no problem with
recreating it, but I would hate it to go wonky when I'm not there, as the
other staff are not that Outlook literate
--
Ray Rogers

--
"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
news
Happens all the time. DL's are not reliable and become corrupt. Most of
us don't use them for that reason. You'll need to recreate the DL if you
want to keep using it.

--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Barry H White" Barry H wrote in
message ...
When sending a message using a Distribution List the follow message
appears
"An internal support function returned an error"
The only option is OK but the message is not sent

There is an answer on Article Q222329 with the same problem but it
relates
only to Outlook 2000. The problem seems to be addresses on the DL that
do not
match contact details in the address books

In Outlook 2002, you can go to the Dist list and press "Update" which I
think resolves problems or removes error address, but it does not seem
to work

Help Please





Ads
 

Web Advertising - Tile Forum - Credit - Cheap Loan - Cheap Car Insurance